TULSA METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING COMMISSION

Tulsa Metropolitan Area Planning Commission

Minutes of Meeting No. 2233

Wednesday, March 15, 2000 1:30 p.m.

Francis Campbell City Council Room

Plaza Level, Tulsa Civic Center

Members Present Members Absent Staff Present Others Present

Carnes Boyle Beach Jackere, Legal

Collins Jackson Bruce Counsel

Harmon Dunlap

Hill Huntsinger

Horner Matthews

Ledford

Midget

Pace

Westervelt

The notice and agenda of said meeting were posted in the Reception Area of the INCOG offices on Monday, March 13, 2000 at 8:35 a.m., posted in the Office of the City Clerk at 8:24 a.m., as well as in the office of the County Clerk at 8:25 a.m.

After declaring a quorum present, Chair Westervelt called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m.

Minutes:

Approval of the minutes of February 23, 2000 Meeting No. 2231

On MOTION of CARNES the TMAPC voted 7-0-0 (Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Ledford, Pace, Westervelt “aye”; no “nays”; none “abstaining”; Boyle, Collins, Jackson, Midget “absent“) to APPROVE the minutes of the meeting of February 23, 2000, Meeting No. 2231.

Minutes:

Approval of the minutes of March 1, 2000 Meeting No. 2232

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Mr. Midget in at 1:35 p.m.

REPORTS:

Chairman’s Reports:

Mr. Westervelt stated that he would like to applaud the new structure regarding the coordination meetings between INCOG staff, Public Works, TDA, UDD and Neighborhood Inspections. He explained that there would be weekly coordination meetings in order to integrate the entire process. He commented that this will be a helpful step and the process will be improved.

Mr. Westervelt thanked Mr. Midget for his efforts for getting the coordination meetings in place.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Director’s Report:

Mr. Dunlap stated that there are several items on the City Council agenda for Thursday, March 16, 2000. He indicated that he would be attending the City Council meeting.

Ms. Matthews stated that there are two neighborhoods that have indicated that they would be coming before the TMAPC requesting rezoning.

Ms. Matthews reported that the South Maple Ridge Neighborhood Association is requesting a worksession for March 22 at 2:00 p.m. She stated that staff has requested background documentation, which has not been received at this time.

Ms. Matthews stated that the Oakview/Timberlane Neighborhood has indicated that they will be requesting RE zoning. This is a neighborhood that the TMAPC encouraged to come forward to request the rezoning after a couple of infill cases. She indicated that staff has already met with the neighborhood leader. Ms. Matthews concluded that it appears that the rezoning issue will be the subject of the April worksession and the request for rezoning in May.

Mr. Westervelt asked Ms. Matthews if the Historic Preservation item would be on the worksession schedule for next week. In response, Ms. Matthews stated that it is tentatively scheduled for next week. Ms. Matthews indicated that if the documentation is submitted in time, then the item would be on the March 22^nd worksession. Mr. Westervelt stated that he will be out of town next week and would like to participate if it is not an inconvenience. Ms. Matthews stated that it is within the Chairman’s power to request a continuance.

Mr. Midget asked Ms. Matthews if staff has heard anything from the Irving Neighborhood. In response, Ms. Matthews stated that she has not heard anything from that neighborhood.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

SUBDIVISIONS

LOT-SPLITS FOR DISCUSSION:

L-19027 – Sack & Associates (784) (PD-18) (CD-8)

11015 East 73^rd Street South

Staff Recommendation:

The applicant has applied to split Tract A of PUD 567 into two tracts called Tract A-1 and Tract A-2. The two proposed tracts meet the CO and PUD requirements. In lieu of a PUD amendment, the applicant has provided the building area square footage for each tract.

Staff believes this lot-split meets with the intent of the Zoning Code and would therefore recommend APPROVAL of the lot-split, with the allocation of floor area for each tract as follows:

Tract A-1 (2.57 acres) 65,000 SF (Tulsa Residence Inn)

Tract A-2 (1.83 acres) 45,000 SF (Tulsa Springhill Suites)

There were no interested parties wishing to speak.

TMAPC Comments:

Mr. Westervelt asked staff if the lot-split request is an acceptable process to reallocate the square footage rather than through an amendment to the PUD. In response, Mr. Beach answered affirmatively.

Mr. Westervelt asked if the lot-split is the best way to achieve the reallocation of the square footage. In response, Mr. Dunlap stated that in the past this was achieved by a minor amendment, but recently staff began writing recommendations that would allow this to be achieved either by lot-split or minor amendment.

Applicant’s Comments:

Ted Sack, 111 South Elgin, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74120, stated that the subject application is part of one development area, and normally the square footage is allocated for each individual lot as part of the platting process. In this particular case, a lot-split application is being used to achieve the square footage allocation. He indicated that as long as the square footage was allocated and an amendment to the deed-of-dedication is filed, Mr. Stump thought this would be similar to a subdivision plat being filed.

Mr. Sack stated that the there were two different motel units built on the property. Now his client would like to split this property in order to finance each project separately. The tracts must be split so that they will be independent tracts.

TMAPC Comments:

Mr. Jackere stated that the TMAPC could approve this application subject to Legal’s review of the legal requirements for this particular application.

TMAPC Action; 8 members present:

On MOTION of HORNER, the TMAPC voted 8-0-0 (Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Ledford, Midget, Pace, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Boyle, Collins, Jackson "absent") to APPROVE the lot-split for L-19027 subject to the following allocation of floor area for each tract: Tract A-1 (2.57 acres), 65,000 SF (Tulsa Residence Inn); Tract A-2 (1.83 acres) 45,000 SF (Tulsa Springhill Suites).

* * * * * * * * * * * *

RESCIND TIE AGREEMENT ON LOT-SPLIT RECEIVING PRIOR APPROVAL:

L-18715 (PD-18) (CD-2)

South of Southeast Corner of East 73^rd Street & South Wheeling

Staff Recommendation:

On September 21, 1998, staff approved a lot-split that split Tract 4 into Lot 4 and Lot 5, with the condition that Lot 4 be tied to Tract A. At that time, the owner of Tract A was preparing to purchase Lot 4, which would have been land-locked without the tie agreement. The applicant had the deed stamped tying Lot 4 to Tract A.

Since that time, Tract A owner has not purchased Lot 4 and the present owner has another buyer who desires to purchase both Lot 4 and Lot 5. However, the approved lot-split restricts Lot 4 from being conveyed separately from Tract A.

The applicant is requesting that the Tulsa Metropolitan Area Planning Commission rescind the tie agreement of Lot 4 to Tract A, with the condition that Lot 4 be tied to Lot 5.

Staff has reviewed the applicant’s request, noting that currently Lot 4 and Tract A are under different ownership. Staff would therefore recommend APPROVAL of rescinding the tie agreement between Lot 4 and Tract A, with the condition that Lot 4 be tied to Lot 5.

There were no interested parties wishing to speak.

The applicant indicated his agreement with staff’s recommendation.

TMAPC Action; 8 members present:

On MOTION of HORNER, the TMAPC voted 8-0-0 (Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Ledford, Midget, Pace, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Boyle, Collins, Jackson "absent") to APPROVE rescinding the tie agreement for L-18715, subject to the condition that Lot 4 be tied to Lot 5 as recommended by staff.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

LOT-SPLITS FOR RATIFICATION OF PRIOR APPROVAL:

L-19016 – Sisemore Weisz & Associates (3602) (PD-2) (CD-1)

1000 East Pine (approximately)

L-19021 – Tulsa Development Authority (2502) (PD-2) (CD-1)

1108 East Zion

L-19023 – Shannon Baker (1590) (PD-23) (County)

2617-A South 225^th West Avenue

L-19028 – Sack & Associates (1483) (PD-18) (CD-8)

8312 South 68^th East Avenue

L-19032 – Sisemore Weisz & Associates (583) (PD-18) (CD-9)

2669 East 69^th Street South (approximately)

Staff Recommendation:

Mr. Beach stated that these lot-splits are in order and staff recommends APPROVAL.

TMAPC Action; 8 members present:

On MOTION of MIDGET, the TMAPC voted 8-0-0 (Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Ledford, Midget, Pace, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Boyle, Collins, Jackson "absent") to RATIFY these lot-splits given prior approval, finding them in accordance with Subdivision Regulations.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

FINAL PLAT:

PENSKE AT METRO PARK (3294) (PD-18) (CD-5)

South of the southwest corner of East 51^st Street South and South 129^th East Avenue.

Staff Recommendation:

Mr. Bruce stated that all of the release letters have been received and everything is in order. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

The applicant indicated his agreement with staff’s recommendation.

There were no interested parties wishing to speak.

TMAPC Action; 8 members present:

* * * * * * * * * * * *

PRELIMINARY PLAT:

Pryor Bank - (2683) (PD 26) (CD 8)

½ mile south of the SW/c of East 101^st Street & South Memorial

Staff Recommendation:

This plat consists of one lot in one block on 1.89 acres. It will be developed under PUD 619 as a bank.

The following were discussed February 17, 2000 at the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meeting:

Zoning:

The PUD was approved in November 1999. This project is in Development Area A-1 of the PUD, which permits all uses permitted by right in OL zoning and drive-in banking, establishes the setbacks shown on this plat, and requires that all access points be approved by Traffic Engineering.

Streets/access:

The plat dedicates 38 feet of right-of-way along the south side to go with another 12 feet abutting on the south. The development plan submitted with the PUD shows a boulevard street through this area to serve the remainder of the PUD. Presumably additional right-of-way would be dedicated during platting of the adjacent property. This street would serve as a collector street for the remainder of the development.
Somdecerff, Transportation, stated that the right-of-way needs to be 60 feet if the street will be a standard collector OR actual paving width plus 24 feet if it is to be a boulevard street. A 30-foot radius at the corner of the new street and Memorial Drive will be required in either case.
Jones, applicant will check on the plans for this street.
Eshelman, Traffic, stated that the access limits are acceptable as shown.

Sewer:

Sewer is readily available to serve the project.
There were no specific comments or requirements.

Water:

Water is readily available to serve the project.
Lee, Water, stated that the existing water line would need to be extended along the new street. He also stated that a fire hydrant might be needed along the new street near Memorial Drive.

Storm Drainage:

This site drains generally toward the northwest.
McCormick, Stormwater, stated that detention is required.

Other:

The utility easements shown were acceptable to the TAC members present.

Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject to the conditions listed below.

Waivers of Subdivision Regulations:

1. None requested.

Special Conditions:

1. Dedicate right-of-way to accommodate the new street and a 30-foot radius at its intersection with Memorial Drive.

Standard Conditions:

1. All conditions of PUD 619 shall be met prior to release of final plat, including any applicable provisions in the covenants or on the face of the plat. Include PUD approval date and references to Section 1100-1107 of the Zoning Code in the covenants.

2. Utility easements shall meet the approval of the utilities. Coordinate with Subsurface Committee if underground plant is planned. Show additional easements as required. Existing easements shall be tied to or related to property line and/or lot lines.

3. Water and sanitary sewer plans shall be approved by the Public Works Department prior to release of final plat. (Include language for W/S facilities in covenants.)

4. Pavement or landscape repair within restricted water line, sewer line, or utility easements as a result of water or sewer line or other utility repairs due to breaks and failures, shall be borne by the owner(s) of the lot(s).

5. Any request for creation of a Sewer Improvement District shall be submitted to the Public Works Department Engineer prior to release of final plat.

6. Paving and/or drainage plans (as required) shall be approved by the Public Works Department.

7. Any request for a Privately Financed Public Improvement (PFPI) shall be submitted to the Public Works Department.

8. A topo map shall be submitted for review by TAC (Subdivision Regulations). (Submit with drainage plans as directed.)

9. Street names shall be approved by the Public Works Department and shown on plat.

10. All curve data, including corner radii, shall be shown on final plat as applicable.

11. Bearings, or true N/S, etc., shall be shown on perimeter of land being platted or other bearings as directed by the County Engineer.

12. All adjacent streets, intersections and/or widths thereof shall be shown on plat.

13. It is recommended that the developer coordinate with the Public Works Department during the early stages of street construction concerning the ordering, purchase and installation of street marker signs. (Advisory, not a condition for plat release.)

14. It is recommended that the applicant and/or his engineer or developer coordinate with the Tulsa City/County Health Department for solid waste disposal, particularly during the construction phase and/or clearing of the project. Burning of solid waste is prohibited.

15. The method of sewage disposal and plans therefor shall be approved by the City/County Health Department. [Percolation tests (if applicable) are required prior to preliminary approval of plat.]

16. The owner(s) shall provide the following information on sewage disposal system if it is to be privately operated on each lot: type, size and general location. (This information to be included in restrictive covenants on plat.)

17. The method of water supply and plans therefor shall be approved by the City/County Health Department.

18. All lots, streets, building lines, easements, etc. shall be completely dimensioned.

19. The key or location map shall be complete.

20. A Corporation Commission letter, Certificate of Non-Development, or other records as may be on file, shall be provided concerning any oil and/or gas wells before plat is released. (A building line shall be shown on plat on any wells not officially plugged. If plugged, provide plugging records.)

21. A "Letter of Assurance" regarding installation of improvements shall be provided prior to release of final plat. (Including documents required under 3.6.5 Subdivision Regulations.)

22. Applicant is advised of his responsibility to contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding Section 404 of the Clean Waters Act.

23. All other Subdivision Regulations shall be met prior to release of final plat.

There were no interested parties wishing to speak.

The applicant indicated his agreement with staff’s recommendation.

TMAPC Comments:

Mr. Ledford pointed out that the case map for this application illustrates that the subject property is south of the athletic center; however, it is actually north of the John Jacobson Center and the Presbyterian Church. The case map is incorrect.

TMAPC Action; 8 members present:

On MOTION of MIDGET, the TMAPC voted 8-0-0 (Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Ledford, Midget, Pace, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Boyle, Collins, Jackson "absent") to APPROVE the preliminary plat for Pryor Bank, subject to special conditions and standard conditions as recommended by staff.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Riverside Shurgard - (783) (PD 18) (CD 2)

Approximately ¼ mile east of South Peoria Ave. on the south side of East 71^st St. South

Staff Recommendation:

This plat consists of one lot in one block on 1.93 acres. It will be developed as a mini-storage.

The following were discussed February 17, 2000 at the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meeting:

1. Zoning:

The zoning is CS and RM-1. The Board of Adjustment approved mini-storage use on the property in November 1999.

2. Streets/access:

Full right-of-way exists for 71^st Street. There is one access location shown on the plat.
Somdecerff, Transportation, stated that the standard dedication language needs to be stricken from the Deed of Dedication and Restrictive Covenants since there is no dedication being made.

3. Sewer:

· Sanitary sewer is available to serve the project.

· There were no comments.

4. Water:

· Water service is available to the site.

· Lee, Water, stated the applicant needs to check with the fire marshal to determine his requirements.

5. Storm Drainage:

· This is a relatively flat site. The development would cover nearly the entire site with buildings or paving except at the perimeter for required landscaping.

· McCormick, Stormwater, stated there will not be detention requirements and there are no concerns with the development.

6. Other:

An 11’ perimeter U/E is shown.
Utility easements were satisfactory to the utility companies represented.

Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject to the conditions listed below.

Waivers of Subdivision Regulations:

1. None requested.

Special Conditions:

1. Water service with fire hydrants and appropriate easements must be provided as required by the Fire Marshal.

Standard Conditions:

1. Utility easements shall meet the approval of the utilities. Coordinate with Subsurface Committee if underground plant is planned. Show additional easements as required. Existing easements shall be tied to or related to property line and/or lot lines.

2. Pavement or landscape repair within restricted water line, sewer line, or utility easements as a result of water or sewer line or other utility repairs due to breaks and failures, shall be borne by the owner(s) of the lot(s).

3. Paving and/or drainage plans (as required) shall be approved by County Engineer.

4. A topo map shall be submitted for review by TAC (Subdivision Regulations). (Submit with drainage plans as directed.)

5. Street names shall be approved by the County Engineer and shown on plat.

6. All curve data, including corner radii, shall be shown on final plat as applicable.

7. Bearings, or true N/S, etc., shall be shown on perimeter of land being platted or other bearings as directed by the County Engineer.

8. All adjacent streets, intersections and/or widths thereof shall be shown on plat.

9. It is recommended that the developer coordinate with the City Public Works during the early stages of street construction concerning the ordering, purchase and installation of street marker signs. (Advisory, not a condition for plat release.)

10. It is recommended that the applicant and/or his engineer or developer coordinate with the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality for solid waste disposal, particularly during the construction phase and/or clearing of the project. Burning of solid waste is prohibited.

11. The method of water supply and plans therefor shall be approved by the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality.

12. All lots, streets, building lines, easements, etc. shall be completely dimensioned.

13. The key or location map shall be complete.

14. A Corporation Commission letter, Certificate of Non-Development, or other records as may be on file, shall be provided concerning any oil and/or gas wells before plat is released. (A building line shall be shown on plat on any wells not officially plugged. If plugged, provide plugging records.)

15. A "Letter of Assurance" regarding installation of improvements shall be provided prior to release of final plat. (Including documents required under 3.6.5 Subdivision Regulations.)

16. Applicant is advised of his responsibility to contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding Section 404 of the Clean Waters Act.

17. All other Subdivision Regulations shall be met prior to release of final plat.

There were no interested parties wishing to speak.

The applicant indicated his agreement with staff’s recommendation.

TMAPC Action; 8 members present:

On MOTION of LEDFORD, the TMAPC voted 8-0-0 (Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Ledford, Midget, Pace, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Boyle, Collins, Jackson "absent") to APPROVE the preliminary plat for Riverside Shurgard, subject to special conditions and standard conditions as recommended by staff.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Commissioner Collins in at 1:53 p.m.

Ranch Creek Addition - (1313) (PD 15) (County)

East of SE/c East 106^th Street North & North Memorial Drive

Staff Recommendation:

This plat consists of 49 lots in five blocks on 37.66 acres. It will be developed for single-family residential uses.

The following were discussed February 17, 2000 at the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meeting:

Zoning:

TMAPC recommended denial of RS zoning and approval of RE zoning. The proposed plat reflects the standards of RE zoning in lot size and setbacks.

Streets/access:

All new streets will have 60 foot-wide rights-of-way. Stubs are being provided at the east and south sides but not to the west. If right-of-way is being dedicated for 106^th Street, it should be noted on the plat.
Rains, County Engineering, stated that limits of access need to be shown on the plat along 106^th Street. He also noted that the names of the two north-south streets should be changed to 88^th East Avenue and 90^th East Avenue.

3. Sewer:

· Sewage disposal will be handled individually on each lot. The applicant indicated septic systems would be used. The ODEQ requirements state that for individual septic systems with a public water supply, the lots must be at least ½ acre and must perc in 30 minutes or less. The lot sizes shown are all in excess of ½ acre. For any lots that don’t meet the perc test requirements, an aerobic system would also be permitted based on the lot sizes. A release will be needed from ODEQ before the plat will be released for filing.

4. Water:

· Water service will be provided by Washington County Rural Water District #3. A release letter will be needed from them before the plat will be released for filing.

5. Storm Drainage:

· The existing topo indicates the site falls about 80 feet from the northwest to the southeast to a floodplain. It may be difficult to build on Lot 3, Block 2 because of the floodplain.

· Rains, County Engineering, stated that he does not have enough information to determine if detention will be required or if there are any stormwater management issues. He will discuss this further with the applicant as construction plans become available.

6. Other:

· Nelson, Southwestern Bell, stated that utility easements need to be shown on the plat as follows: 11’ back-to-back along the rear lot lines, 17.5’ around the perimeter of the property, and 5’ or 10’ along the side lot lines as necessary to continue service.

Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject to the conditions listed below.

Waivers of Subdivision Regulations:

1. None requested.

Special Conditions:

1. Show limits of access along 106^th Street; provide curve data for all curves in lot lines and street rights-of-way; verify and provide corrected street names on the face of the plat.

2. Provide a letter of release from Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality as to the appropriateness of the lots for individual on-site sewage disposal systems. Include language in the covenants related to the installation and maintenance of individual on-site sewage disposal.

3. Provide a letter of release from water service provider stating that the design of the water system and easements meets their requirements.

Standard Conditions:

3. Paving and/or drainage plans (as required) shall be approved by County Engineer.

4. A topo map shall be submitted for review by TAC (Subdivision Regulations). (Submit with drainage plans as directed.)

5. Street names shall be approved by the County Engineer and shown on plat.

6. All curve data, including corner radii, shall be shown on final plat as applicable.

7. Bearings, or true N/S, etc. shall be shown on perimeter of land being platted or other bearings as directed by the County Engineer.

8. All adjacent streets, intersections and/or widths thereof shall be shown on plat.

9. It is recommended that the developer coordinate with the County Engineer during the early stages of street construction concerning the ordering, purchase and installation of street marker signs. (Advisory, not a condition for plat release.)

11. The method of water supply and plans therefor shall be approved by the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality.

12. All lots, streets, building lines, easements, etc. shall be completely dimensioned.

13. The key or location map shall be complete.

15. A "Letter of Assurance" regarding installation of improvements shall be provided prior to release of final plat. (Including documents required under 3.6.5 Subdivision Regulations.)

16. Applicant is advised of his responsibility to contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding Section 404 of the Clean Waters Act.

17. All other Subdivision Regulations shall be met prior to release of final plat.

TMAPC Comments:

Mr. Westervelt expressed concerns with there being only one access point. In response, Mr. Beach stated that there are some topography challenges along East 106^th Street, which creates some sight distance problems to the west. Mr. Beach indicated that there was brief discussion regarding the access point and the stub streets to the east and south. Mr. Beach stated that the County Engineer did not demand or require a second access be given. Mr. Beach commented that TAC did not feel that it was important that a second access be provided.

Applicant’s Comments:

Michael Denny, White Surveying, 9936 East 55^th Place, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74146, stated that he had discussed a second access point to the northwest corner, which would be atop the hill. He explained that sight distance was an issue regarding the second access point to the northwest corner. He stated that there are plans to develop the property to the east in the very near future. With this in mind, the one access was proposed because the stub streets will go through when the property to the east is developed.

TMAPC Comments:

Mr. Ledford stated that the topography in this subject area makes it difficult to add a second point of access. In the alternative, the TMAPC could require that the applicant enlarge the entrance with a divided median so that there will be access on both sides of a divided median. If an accident blocks one side, one could still access around it and this has been done in the city before.

TMAPC Action; 9 members present:

On MOTION of HORNER, the TMAPC voted 9-0-0 (Carnes, Collins, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Ledford, Midget, Pace, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Boyle, Jackson "absent") to APPROVE the preliminary plat for Ranch Creek Addition subject to special conditions and standard conditions; subject to access points being reviewed by the TMAPC as recommended by the TMAPC.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Plainview Heights Addition Amended (PUD 618) (594) (PD 17) (CD 6)

422 South 129^th East Avenue

Staff Recommendation:

This plat consists of one lot in one block on 2.49 acres. It will be developed under PUD 618, which is approved for selected light industrial uses.

The following were discussed February 17, 2000 at the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meeting:

1. Zoning:

The property was rezoned to IL and PUD 618 was approved in October 1999. The uses permitted are limited to uses in Use Unit 23 except garbage trucks storage, truck stop, truck wash, truck establishments, and building contract construction services. The PUD requires a 120’ setback from the centerline of 129^th East Avenue. This should be shown on the plat.

2. Streets/access:

East 4^th Street (labeled “Place” on the plat) has the full width right-of-way west of the tract but only half right-of-way along the north side of the tract. It connects with 127^th East Ave. and could provide access to 129^th E. Ave. for the residential properties to the west and south.

Somdecerff, Transportation, stated that the south half of the right-of-way needs to be dedicated along with a 30-foot radius at the corner of 129^th East Avenue.
Eshelman, Traffic, stated that the access limits shown need to be reduced to 40 feet each. He recommends the extra 36 feet to be taken from the inside in order to make the drives as far apart as possible (36’ from south side of the north drive and 36’ from north side of the south drive).

3. Sewer:

· Sewer is readily available to serve the project. The sewer line should not be shown on the plat.

· There were no specific comments or requirements.

4. Water:

· Water is readily available to serve the project.

· There were no specific comments or requirements.