Tulsa Metropolitan Area Planning Commission

Wednesday, April 5, 2000 1:30 p.m.

Francis Campbell City Council Room

Plaza Level, Tulsa Civic Center

Members Present Members Absent Staff Present Others Present

Boyle Carnes Beach Jackere, Legal

Collins Horner Bruce Counsel

Hill Harmon Dunlap

Jackson Huntsinger

Ledford Matthews

Midget Stump

Pace

Westervelt

The notice and agenda of said meeting were posted in the Reception Area of the INCOG offices on Monday, April 3, 2000 at 9:15 a.m., posted in the Office of the City Clerk at 9:09 a.m., as well as in the office of the County Clerk at 8:09 a.m.

After declaring a quorum present, Chair Westervelt called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m.

REPORTS:

Committee Reports:

Rules and Regulations Committee

Mr. Boyle reported that there was a worksession at 11:30 a.m. this morning and acted on two items. He stated that the first item was the Maple Ridge Association’s request for HP zoning for the Sunset Park Addition. The recommendation of the Committee was to ask the Planning Commission to call for a public hearing on May 24, 2000.

TMAPC Action; 7 members present:

On MOTION of BOYLE, the TMAPC voted 7-0-0 (Boyle, Collins, Hill, Jackson, Ledford, Pace, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Carnes, Harmon, Horner, Midget "absent") to call for a public hearing for the Maple Ridge Association’s HP zoning request for the Sunset Park Addition for May 24, 2000 at 1:30 p.m. as recommended by the Rules and Regulations Committee.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Mr. Boyle reported that the second item considered at the 11:30 a.m. worksession was amendments to the Tulsa Zoning Code, related to restaurants, accessory bars, etc. The Committee recommended that the Planning Commission call for a public hearing at a time to be set by staff.

TMAPC Action; 7 members present:

On MOTION of BOYLE, the TMAPC voted 7-0-0 (Boyle, Collins, Hill, Jackson, Ledford, Pace, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Carnes, Harmon, Horner, Midget "absent") to call for a public hearing for the amendments to the Tulsa Zoning Code relating to the regulation of restaurants, accessory bars, adult entertainment establishments, blood banks, plasma centers, day labor centers, liquor stores and pawn shops at a time to be set by the staff as recommended by the Rules and Regulations Committee.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

CONTINUED ITEMS:

Application No.: z-6757/pud-591-a RS-1 to RS-2/PUD

Applicant: John Sayre (PD-6) (CD-9)

Location: South of southwest corner East 47^th Street and South Gary Avenue

TMAPC Comments:

Mr. Westervelt stated that there have been several letters received and there are several interested parties present. Mr. Westervelt asked Mr. Stump to clarify what has transpired.

Mr. Stump stated that yesterday staff met with one of the owners of the subject property and he is withdrawing his portion of the property from this application. The applicant will have to restructure the PUD to only encompass standards for the remaining portion of property. Mr. Stump suggested that the application be continued to April 26, 2000.

Mr. Stump indicated that the portion of property withdrawn from the subject PUD is the southern portion that was currently a part of the PUD, which is zoned RS-2.

TMAPC Action; 7 members present:

On MOTION of BOYLE, the TMAPC voted 8-0-0 (Boyle, Collins, Hill, Jackson, Ledford, Pace, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Carnes, Harmon, Horner, Midget "absent") to CONTINUE Z-6757 and PUD-591-A to April 26, 2000 at 1:30 p.m.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

PRELIMINARY PLAT:

Woodland Valley Office Park – (0183) (PD-18) (CD-7)

Southside of East 61^st Street South at 91^st East Avenue

TMAPC Comments:

Mr. Westervelt stated that the plat is ahead of the zoning changes.

Applicant’s Comments:

Ted Sack, 111 South Elgin Avenue, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74120, stated that the plat is running ahead of the zoning and there needs to be some adjustment of the development areas. Therefore, he would like to withdraw this preliminary plat and understands that he will not have to meet with TAC again. He indicated that he would be bringing the preliminary plat forward once the amendments to the PUD have been heard.

TMAPC Comments:

Mr. Westervelt stated that he would like a motion stating that the preliminary plat does not have to return to TAC and that the current fees will be applied when the preliminary plat is returned.

TMAPC Action; 7 members present:

On MOTION of BOYLE, the TMAPC voted 7-0-0 (Boyle, Collins, Hill, Jackson, Ledford, Pace, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Carnes, Harmon, Horner, Midget "absent") to APPROVE current fees for the preliminary plat for Woodland Valley Office Park shall be applied when the preliminary plat is refiled and the it will not have to return to the Technical Advisory Committee, as recommended by TMAPC.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Director’s Report:

Mr. Stump stated that the receipts for February are very favorable. He anticipates that the receipts for March and April will be very good as well.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

SUBDIVISIONS

LOT-SPLITS FOR WAIVER OF SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS:

L-19022 – Sisemore Weisz & Associates, Inc. (1893) (PD-6) (CD-9)

2805 South Peoria

Staff Recommendation:

The applicant has applied to take four separate tracts and re-configure them into two tracts. With the proposed configuration, Tract 1 will have four side-lot lines

and Tract 2 will have six side-lot lines, and will require a waiver of the Subdivision Regulations.

Also, the lot-split application required various variances of the RE Bulk and Area requirements. On March 28, 2000, the City Board of Adjustment approved the necessary variances, per plan submitted, and subject to the southern building being used only as an accessory building and not as a second dwelling unit.

Staff believes this lot-split would not have an adverse effect on the surrounding properties and would therefore recommend APPROVAL of the waiver of Subdivision Regulations and of the lot-split.

There were no interested parties wishing to speak.

The applicant indicated his agreement with staff’s recommendation.

TMAPC Action; 7 members present:

* * * * * * * * * * * *

L-19035 – David H. Sanders (193) (PD-5) (CD-3)

902 South 83^rd East Avenue

Staff Recommendation:

The applicant has applied to split a 304.85’ X 154.74’ lot into two tracts. The proposed tracts meet all the RS-1 Bulk and Area requirements. However, the proposed configuration of Tract 1, with a five-foot panhandle, will have four side-lot lines, requiring a waiver of the Subdivision Regulations.

City of Tulsa Public Works Department advises staff that sewer service is not available to Tract 1 without running a main sewer line along East 9^th Street or 83^rd East Avenue. This would also require a waiver of the Subdivision Regulations. The Technical Advisory Committee reviewed this application at their March 16, 2000, meeting and recommended denial.

Given the City of Tulsa Public Work Department’s and the Technical Advisory Committee’s position, staff recommends DENIAL of the two waivers of the Subdivision Regulations.

Applicant’s Comments:

David Sanders, no address given, stated that he is representing the Henry Snow Trust. He indicated that he would like to create a panhandle and attach it to the adjacent property so that the lot being split off will have access to the City sewer system. He explained that there are three other panhandle lots in the subject area and requests that he be allowed the same privilege.

Mr. Sanders stated that the sewer department objects to panhandles. He commented that there is no physical problem with the subject property, but a technical problem. He indicated that the last panhandle created in the subject area was as recent as 1993.

Jeff Thompson, Premiere Properties, no address given, representing the Henry Snow Trust, stated that there is a service sewer line going to the east side of the subject property. On the south side of the subject property is a mini-storage and the owner is in the process of building an office building. The mini-storage’s main sewer line will be from 11^th Street. He explained that if his client were forced to install a main sewer line it wouldn’t serve any other lots except the subject property. He stated that currently there is a four-inch sewer line servicing the subject property and the sewer department would like an eight-inch main line installed.

TMAPC Comments:

In response to Ms. Pace, Mr. Beach stated that the proposal is a bad arrangement for lots. He explained that the five-foot strip essentially disappears to the casual observer. The lot on the left will eventually assume that their property goes back the additional five feet and then it becomes very confusing in establishing property boundaries in the future.

Mr. Boyle asked how the Planning Commission could justify denying this request based on the fact that there are three panhandle lots within walking distance of the subject property. In response, Mr. Beach stated that he does not know if the Planning Commission can justify denying this case based on the fact that there are three other panhandle lots in the subject area. Mr. Beach commented that he does not know if allowing three poorly-done panhandle lots in the past will justify another one being done poorly today.

Mr. Ledford stated that the Infill Task Force struggled with this issue and it was never really solved. He indicated that it was up to the Utility Board to come up with a policy that panhandle lots could be utilized to serve public sewer. He stated that the problem with panhandle lots is that they are usually never fenced and that portion is usually utilized by the owner of the adjacent lot, which is all right as long as the two neighbors cooperate and work together. It will be difficult to get a backhoe or tractor in the five feet to rework the private main, and that is where Public Works is coming from. All of the subdivisions are required to have

an eight-inch service main in order to be considered a lot. For the subject to property to be considered a lot, it will have to have access to a public sewer line.

Mr. Boyle recognized Mr. Sanders.

Mr. Sanders stated that he would increase the panhandle to ten or fifteen feet. In response, Mr. Westervelt stated that fifteen feet would put in the middle of the one-story metal building.

Mr. Stump stated that Public Works needs an eight-inch line extended into the subject area for future service to people off-site. Since the subject property falls from east to west, then maybe someone farther to the east needs to have the ability to tie into the sewer system. When a panhandle is built it is not a system that can serve other areas and in some areas there are no need for that.

Mr. Westervelt informed staff that the Planning Commission needs more technical information to make a decision on this application.

Mr. Ledford stated that the Planning Commission may need to postpone this application until the next hearing date.

Mr. Midget in at 1:52 p.m.

Mr. Thompson stated that there is a time issue with this application and that there is a contract on one of the homes. He commented that he understands Public Works wanting an eight-inch service line. He indicated that he gave the City of Tulsa a five-foot easement on the south boundary line to the entire subject property. He stated that he would give ten feet if it were necessary. He indicated that he would have to go to the adjacent property owner in order to give a fifteen-foot easement. He stated that he has already tried to talk with the adjacent property owner and he is not willing to allow the extra five feet.

Mr. Thompson stated that South 83^rd is on the east side of the subject property line and all of the other houses are serviced by sewer lines and a 162’ sewer main will not do anyone any good.

Mr. Boyle stated that he would like to hear from Public Works regarding this application.

TMAPC Action; 8 members present:

On MOTION of BOYLE, the TMAPC voted 8-0-0 (Boyle, Collins, Hill, Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Pace, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Carnes, Harmon, Horner "absent") to CONTINUE L-19035 to April 12, 2000 and request that Public Works attend the meeting or staff obtain the technical information that the Planning Commission requires regarding the future development and the existing conditions of the neighborhood in order to make a fair determination.

LOT-SPLITS FOR WAIVER OF SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS:

L-19007 – White Surveying Company (1893) (PD-6) (CD-9)

2805 South Peoria

L-19008 – Sack & Associates, Inc. (1994) (PD-17) (CD-5)

East 41^st Street and 109^th East Avenue

L-19025 – Pete Burd (113) (PD-15) (County)

8811 East 116^th Street North

L-19030 – Victor Bentley (2502) (PD-2) (CD-1)

1001 East Pine

L-19038 – Warren G. Morris (793) (PD-6) (CD-4)

1565 South Swan Drive

L-19039 – Jerry Ledford, Jr. (1093) (PD-5) (CD-4)

Northeast corner East 21^st Street & Yale

L-19040 – Burlin Pickens, Jr. (3591) (PD-23) (County)

West 54^th Street and 107^th West Avenue

L-19041 – Pine and Mingo LLC (3603) (PD-16) (CD-3)

South of southwest corner of East Pine and North Mingo

L-19043 – Tulsa Development Authority (2502) (PD-2) (CD-1)

Southwest corner East Apache & Peoria

L-19044 – City of Tulsa (594) (PD-17) (CD-6)

12145 East 11^th Street

L19045 – City of Tulsa (894) (PD-17) (CD-6)

1829 South Garnett

Mr. Ledford announced that he would be abstaining from these lot-splits.

Staff Recommendation:

Mr. Beach stated that all of these lot-splits are in order and staff recommends approval.

TMAPC Action; 8 members present:

On MOTION of BOYLE, the TMAPC voted 7-0-1 (Boyle, Collins, Hill, Jackson, Midget, Pace, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; Ledford ”abstaining"; Carnes, Harmon, Horner "absent") to RATIFY these lot-splits given prior approval, finding them in accordance with Subdivision Regulations, as recommended by staff.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

CHANGE OF ACCESS ON FINAL PLAT:

Lot 2, Block 1, Business Commons at Metro Park

South side East 51^st Street, West of Broken Arrow Expressway

Staff Recommendation:

Mr. Beach stated that there is an existing 40’ access on the easterly corner of the subject property. There is a 50’ limit of no access and a proposed 40’ access to allow this new driveway. The Traffic Engineer has reviewed and signed off on this proposal. Staff recommends approval.

TMAPC Comments:

Mr. Boyle asked why staff did not provide a written recommendation. In response, Mr. Beach stated that staff normally does not give a written recommendation on this type of application. Mr. Beach commented that this type of application is relatively routine. Mr. Beach explained that once the Traffic Engineer has approved the change of access, it has not been staff’s practice in the past to provide a written report. Mr. Beach pointed out that staff has provided a map and the actual application, which Jon Eshelman has signed.

Mr. Westervelt stated that the Planning Commission reviews their packets prior to the meeting and it would be beneficial to have a brief recommendation on the change of access in the future.

There were no interested parties wishing to speak.

TMAPC Action; 8 members present:

On MOTION of BOYLE, the TMAPC voted 8-0-0 (Boyle, Collins, Hill, Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Pace, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Carnes, Harmon, Horner, "absent") to APPROVE the change of access on recorded plat for Lot 2, Block 1, Business Commons at Metro Park as recommended by staff.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

FINAL PLAT:

Leadership Office Park (1683) (PD-18) (CD-8)

Northwest corner East 89^th Street and South Yale Avenue

Staff Recommendation:

Mr. Beach stated that all release letters have been received and staff recommends approval.

There were no interested parties wishing to speak.

TMAPC Action; 8 members present:

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Fellowship Bible Church (2283) (PD-18) (CD-8)

5434 East 91^st Street

Mr. Ledford announced that he would be abstaining from this application.

Staff Recommendation:

Mr. Beach stated that all release letters have been received and staff recommends approval. He indicated that this application also needs the reinstatement of the preliminary plat in addition to the approval of the final plat. He explained that the preliminary plat has expired.

There were no interested parties wishing to speak.

TMAPC Action; 8 members present:

On MOTION of BOYLE, the TMAPC voted 7-0-1 (Boyle, Collins, Hill, Jackson, Midget, Pace, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; Ledford ”abstaining"; Carnes, Harmon, Horner, "absent") to APPROVE the reinstatement of the preliminary plat for Fellowship Bible Church and to APPROVE the final plat for Fellowship Bible Church as recommended by staff.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Carbondale Assembly of God Church (2792) (PD-9) (CD-2)

Northwest corner of West 51^st Street and South Yukon Avenue

Staff Recommendation:

Mr. Beach stated that all release letters have been received and staff recommends approval.

There were no interested parties wishing to speak.

TMAPC Action; 8 members present:

Frenchman’s Creek (3483) (PD-26) (CD-8)

South of East 116^th Street South and South Hudson Court

Staff Recommendation:

Mr. Bruce stated that there is a space left between the emergency access/utility easements and 116^th Street. There is an existing easement in this area and a reference to the existing recordation of book and page is required to be on the plat before staff will sign the final plat. Staff recommends approval subject to the requirement of the reference for the existing easement.

There were no interested parties wishing to speak.

The applicant indicated his agreement with staff’s recommendation.

TMAPC Action; 8 members present:

On MOTION of BOYLE, the TMAPC voted 8-0-0 (Boyle, Collins, Hill, Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Pace, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Carnes, Harmon, Horner, "absent") to APPROVE the final plat for Frenchman’s Creek subject to a reference of the recording document of the existing easement on the face of the plat as recommended by staff.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Eastside Market (PUD 602) (0684) (PD-18) (CD-8)

Northwest corner of East 71^st Street South and South Garnett Road

Staff Recommendation:

Mr. Bruce stated that all release letters have been received and staff recommends approval.

There were no interested parties wishing to speak.

TMAPC Action; 8 members present:

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Preston Woods (Trails) (2783) (PD-26) (CD-8)

North of intersection of East 111^th Street South and South Hudson Avenue

Staff Recommendation:

Mr. Beach stated that all release letters have been received. He indicated that this particular addition will be utilizing a detention basin in the addition to the west

and Public Works agreed to the configuration and language that will be recorded regarding the participation of the homeowners in this Preston Woods addition in the maintenance of that existing basin. He stated that Legal has not completed reviewing the language and staff will hold the final plat until the language is approved by Legal.

There were no interested parties wishing to speak.

TMAPC Action; 8 members present:

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Crestview II (2402) (PD-25) (CD-1)

South and East of the southeast corner of the intersection of East 36^th Street North and North Cincinnati Avenue East

Staff Recommendation:

Mr. Bruce stated that everything is in order and staff recommends approval.

There were no interested parties wishing to speak.

TMAPC Action; 8 members present:

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Commissioner Collins out at 2:00 p.m.

PRELIMINARY PLAT AND FINAL PLAT:

Riverside Market (PUD 306-G) (2083) (PD-18) (CD-2)

Southeast corner of East 95^th Street and South Delaware Avenue

Staff Recommendation:

This plat consists of two lots in two blocks. The land area is approximately 25.7 acres and will be developed under PUD 306-G with commercial uses. PUD 306-G was a major amendment that produced two new development areas designed specifically for this project.

The following were discussed March 16, 2000 at the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meeting:

Zoning:

· The major amendment to the PUD was approved in April 1999. This project occupies Development Areas A and B of the amended PUD.

Streets/access:

Eshelman, Traffic, stated that the access limits are acceptable as shown.

3. Sewer:

· Sewer is readily available to serve the project.

· There were no specific requirements.

4. Water:

· Water is readily available to serve the project.

· There were no specific requirements.

5. Storm Drainage:

· This site drains generally toward Vensel Creek or existing storm sewer structures.

· There were no specific requirements.

6. Other:

· The utility easements shown were acceptable to the TAC members present.

Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat and the final plat subject to the standard conditions listed below.

Waivers of Subdivision Regulations:

1. None requested.

Special Conditions:

1. None needed.

Standard Conditions:

1. All conditions of PUD 306-G shall be met prior to release of final plat, including any applicable provisions in the covenants or on the face of the plat. Include PUD approval date and references to Section 1100-1107 of the Zoning Code in the covenants.

2. Utility easements shall meet the approval of the utilities. Coordinate with Subsurface Committee if underground plant is planned. Show additional easements as required. Existing easements shall be tied to or related to property line and/or lot lines.

3. Water and sanitary sewer plans shall be approved by the Public Works Department prior to release of final plat. (Include language for W/S facilities in covenants.)

4. Pavement or landscape repair within restricted water line, sewer line, or utility easements as a result of water or sewer line or other utility repairs due to breaks and failures, shall be borne by the owner(s) of the lot(s).

5. Any request for creation of a Sewer Improvement District shall be submitted to the Public Works Department Engineer prior to release of final plat.

6. Paving and/or drainage plans (as required) shall be approved by the Public Works Department.

7. Any request for a Privately Financed Public Improvement (PFPI) shall be submitted to the Public Works Department.

8. A topo map shall be submitted for review by TAC (Subdivision Regulations). (Submit with drainage plans as directed.)

9. Street names shall be approved by the Public Works Department and shown on plat.

10. All curve data, including corner radii, shall be shown on final plat as applicable.

11. Bearings, or true N/S, etc. shall be shown on perimeter of land being platted or other bearings as directed by the County Engineer.

12. All adjacent streets, intersections and/or widths thereof shall be shown on plat.

13. It is recommended that the developer coordinate with the Public Works Department during the early stages of street construction concerning the ordering, purchase and installation of street marker signs. (Advisory, not a condition for plat release.)

14. It is recommended that the applicant and/or his engineer or developer coordinate with the Tulsa City/County Health Department for solid waste disposal, particularly during the construction phase and/or clearing of the project. Burning of solid waste is prohibited.

15. The method of sewage disposal and plans therefor shall be approved by the City/County Health Department. [Percolation tests (if applicable) are required prior to preliminary approval of plat.]

16. The owner(s) shall provide the following information on sewage disposal system if it is to be privately operated on each lot: type, size and general location. (This information to be included in restrictive covenants on plat.)

17. The method of water supply and plans therefor shall be approved by the City/County Health Department.

18. All lots, streets, building lines, easements, etc. shall be completely dimensioned.

19. The key or location map shall be complete.

20. A Corporation Commission letter, Certificate of Non-Development, or other records as may be on file, shall be provided concerning any oil and/or gas wells before plat is released. (A building line shall be shown on plat on any wells not officially plugged. If plugged, provide plugging records.)

21. A "Letter of Assurance" regarding installation of improvements shall be provided prior to release of final plat. (Including documents required under 3.6.5 Subdivision Regulations.)

22. Applicant is advised of his responsibility to contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding Section 404 of the Clean Waters Act.

23. All other Subdivision Regulations shall be met prior to release of final plat.

There were no interested parties wishing to speak.

TMAPC Action; 7 members present:

On MOTION of MIDGET, the TMAPC voted 7-0-0 (Boyle, Hill, Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Pace, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Carnes, Collins, Harmon, Horner, "absent") to APPROVE the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat for Riverside Market, subject to standard conditions as recommended by staff.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

PRELIMINARY PLAT:

Sheridan Center (2283) (PD-18) (CD-8)

Southwest corner of East 93^rd Street and South Sheridan Road

Staff Recommendation:

This plat consists of one lot in one block. The land area is not shown but we estimate it to be approximately 2.2 acres and will be developed under PUD-206 with office uses.

The following were discussed March 16, 2000 at the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meeting:

Zoning:

· The PUD was approved in 1977. This project is part of Development Area A of the PUD, which allows all uses permitted by right in the CS zoning district. It establishes the setbacks as shown on this plat and a minimum ten-foot setback from any property lines abutting residential zoning. It also requires landscaped planting areas, landscaped berms, and/or a six-foot high solid screening fence along any abutting residential uses. Maximum floor area ratio is 0.50. These should not be problems based on this plat submittal. However, no site plan was submitted for review. As with all PUDs, detail site plan approval will be required before any building permits may be issued and landscaping, screening and other PUD requirements will be addressed at that time.

Streets/access:

The plat dedicates 50 feet of right-of-way to Sheridan Road. Limits of Access need to be shown on the plat.
Eshelman, Traffic, wants a single access point located toward the south end of the Sheridan Road frontage.

3. Sewer:

· Sewer is readily available to serve the project.

· There were no specific requirements.

4. Water:

· Water is readily available to serve the project.

· There were no specific requirements.

5. Storm Drainage:

· No grading plans or site plans were submitted. There is an existing drainage easement shown on the west end of the property.

· Pennington, applicant, stated that the ditch in this easement will be filled and piped.

6. Other:

· There is an existing 30-foot pipeline easement in favor of Continental Pipeline on the property along approximately the west half of the north property line.

· Webster, Conoco, requested the applicant to send him development plans to review.

· The utility easements shown were acceptable to the TAC members present.

Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject to the standard and special conditions listed below.

Waivers of Subdivision Regulations:

1. None requested.

Special Conditions:

1. In addition to the standard releases, a release from Conoco stating that the proposed development presents no conflict with their existing easement.

Standard Conditions:

1. All conditions of PUD 206 shall be met prior to release of final plat, including any applicable provisions in the covenants or on the face of the plat. Include PUD approval date and references to Section 1100-1107 of the Zoning Code in the covenants.

3. Water and sanitary sewer plans shall be approved by the Public Works Department prior to release of final plat. (Include language for W/S facilities in covenants.)

5. Any request for creation of a Sewer Improvement District shall be submitted to the Public Works Department Engineer prior to release of final plat.

6. Paving and/or drainage plans (as required) shall be approved by the Public Works Department.

7. Any request for a Privately Financed Public Improvement (PFPI) shall be submitted to the Public Works Department.

8. A topo map shall be submitted for review by TAC (Subdivision Regulations). (Submit with drainage plans as directed.)

9. Street names shall be approved by the Public Works Department and shown on plat.

10. All curve data, including corner radii, shall be shown on final plat as applicable.

11. Bearings, or true N/S, etc, shall be shown on perimeter of land being platted or other bearings as directed by the County Engineer.

12. All adjacent streets, intersections and/or widths thereof shall be shown on plat.

15. The method of sewage disposal and plans therefor shall be approved by the City/County Health Department.<