Tulsa Metropolitan Area Planning Commission
Wednesday, May 24, 2000
1:30 p.m.
Francis Campbell City
Council Room
Plaza Level, Tulsa Civic
Center
Members Present Members
Absent Staff Present Others Present
Carnes Boyle Beach Jackere, Legal
Collins Westervelt Bruce Counsel
Harmon Huntsinger
Hill Stump
Horner
Jackson
Ledford
Midget
Pace
The notice and agenda of said meeting were posted in the Reception Area of the INCOG offices on Monday, May 22, 2000 at 8:25 a.m., posted in the Office of the City Clerk at 7:32 a.m., as well as in the office of the County Clerk at 8:16 a.m.
After declaring a quorum present, 2nd Vice Chair Jackson called the meeting to order at 1:31 p.m.
Minutes:
Approval of the
minutes of May 3, 2000 Meeting No. 2238
On MOTION of HORNER the TMAPC voted 6-0-1 (Carnes, Collins, Hill, Horner, Jackson, Pace “aye”; no “nays”; Ledford “abstain”; Boyle, Harmon, Midget, Westervelt “absent“) to APPROVE the minutes of the meeting of May 3, 2000 Meeting No. 2238.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
Mr. Harmon in at 1:32 p.m.
SUBDIVISIONS
CHANGE OF ACCESS ON FINAL PLAT:
East Vue Center (2094) (PD-17)
(CD-6)
Mazzio’s 3975 South Garnett Road
Staff Recommendation:
The proposal is to change the platted access along Garnett Road to provide a 40-foot access at the existing driveway of the Mazzio’s Pizza restaurant.
The Traffic Engineer has reviewed and approved the changes.
Staff recommends approval.
TMAPC Action; 8 members present:
On MOTION of HORNER, the TMAPC voted 8-0-0 (Carnes, Collins, Harmon, Hill,
Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Pace "aye"; no "nays"; none
”abstaining"; Boyle, Midget, Westervelt "absent") to APPROVE the change of access on final plat for East Vue Center as recommended by
staff.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
Mr. Midget in at 1:35 p.m.
PLAT WAIVER:
Southeast corner of East 61st Street and South Hudson Avenue
Staff Recommendation:
Trigger: Special Exception to allow
Children’s Nursery (U.U.5) on a lot in the OL district, approved by BOA
4/25/00.
PURPOSE:
To remodel an existing one-story brick office structure (approximately 6600 SF) for use as a children’s nursery.
GENERAL:
The subject property is lot 1, block 1 of the amended plat of Warren Center East.
It is located at the southeast corner of 61st and Hudson The site is in an area of office, commercial and multifamily residential uses.
STREETS:
The site is bounded by 61st Street on the north and Hudson Avenue on the west. It is accessed off of 61st in the eastern portion of the site and off of Hudson in the southern portion of the site.
It appears that the existing access points off of 61st and Hudson do not coincide with the access as shown on the plat.
SEWER:
Sanitary sewer is present along the south side of 61st Street.
WATER:
Water is present along the east side of Hudson and the south side of 61st Street.
Staff
provides the following comments from the TAC meeting.
1. Streets:
·
Somdecerff, Streets: indicated
that additional radius at the corner of 61st and Hudson would be
required.
·
French, Traffic: indicated that a
change in access should be processed to line up the existing with the platted.
Conclusions:
Based on the TAC discussion and the
checklist, which reflects the policies of TMAPC. Staff recommends approval of the request for plat waiver subject to additional radius return dedication and processing
of change of access.
It
shall be the policy of the Tulsa Metropolitan Area Planning Commission that all
requests for plat waivers shall be evaluated by the staff and by the Technical
Advisory Committee based on the following list. After such evaluation, TMAPC
Staff shall make a recommendation to the TMAPC as to the merits of the plat
waiver request accompanied by the answers to these questions:
A YES answer to the following 3
questions would generally be FAVORABLE to a plat waiver:
YES NO
1) Has property previously been platted? 4 o
2) Are there restrictive covenants contained in a previously
filed plat? o 4
3) Is property adequately described by surrounding platted
properties or street R/W? 4 o
A YES answer to the remaining
questions would generally NOT be favorable to a plat waiver:
4) Is right-of-way dedication required to comply with major
street and highway plan? o 4
5) Will restrictive covenants be filed by separate instrument? o 4
6) Infrastructure requirements
a) Water
i) Is a main line water extension required? o 4
ii) Is an internal system or fire line required? o 4
iii) Are additional easements required? o 4
b) Sanitary Sewer
i) Is a main line extension required? o 4
ii) Is an internal system required? o 4
iii) Are additional easements required? o 4
c) Storm Sewer
i) Is a P.F.P.I. required? o 4
ii) Is an Overland Drainage Easement required? o 4
iii) Is on-site detention required? o 4
iv) Are additional easements required? o 4
7) Floodplain
a) Does the property contain a City of Tulsa (Regulatory)
Floodplain? o 4
b) Does the property contain a F.E.M.A. (Federal) Floodplain? o 4
8) Change of Access
a) Are revisions to existing access locations necessary? 4 o
9) Is the property in a P.U.D.? o 4
a) If yes, was plat recorded for the original P.U.D.? o 4
10) Is this a Major Amendment to a P.U.D.? o 4
a) If yes, does the amendment make changes to the
proposed physical development of the P.U.D.? o 4
If, after consideration of the above criteria, a plat waiver is granted on unplatted properties, a current ALTA/ACSM/NSPS Land Title Survey (and as subsequently revised) shall be required. Said survey shall be prepared in a recordable format and filed at the County Clerk’s office.
Applicant’s Comments:
Ted Sack, 111 South Elgin, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74120, that the subject application is for an existing facility and there are no changes that would necessitate the additional right-of-way. He explained that the additional 30’ radius required at 61st and Hudson would be an encroachment onto the parking lot. He commented that 61st Street has been widened to its potential. Hudson is a double 80’ street with a median located on the west side of the subject property.
Mr. Sack indicated that the additional 30’ radius is not needed by the City of Tulsa for widening purposes. He commented that the request is a matter of policy because it is a subdivision regulation at this point and time.
Mr. Sack requested that the plat waiver be approved and do not make the 30’ radius a requirement.
Mr. Bruce informed the Planning Commission that Mr. Somdecerff stated that should 61st Street sometime in the future be widened to five-lanes, the 30’ radius would needed. Currently, the City of Tulsa does not need the 30’ radius. Mr. Bruce stated that this is a Traffic Engineering issue and staff is presenting Traffic Engineering’s request. This is a position that Traffic Engineering has taken to preserve potential for change in the future.
After a lengthy discussion it was determined that the 30’ radius was not necessary and would encroach onto the existing parking lot.
There were no interested parties wishing to speak.
TMAPC Action; 9 members present:
On MOTION of CARNES, the TMAPC voted 9-0-0 (Carnes, Collins, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Pace "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Boyle, Westervelt "absent") to APPROVE the plat waiver for BOA-18722 per staff recommendation; except with deletion of the requirement for additional right-of-way dedication for curb radii at the intersection with 61st Street South.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
CONTINUED ZONING PUBLIC HEARING
Application No.: pud-405-h major
amendment
Applicant: Wayne Alberty (PD-18) (CD-8)
Location: South
of the southwest corner of East 91st Street and South Memorial Drive
Staff Recommendation:
The subject tract contains 5.25 acres and is located south of the southwest corner of East 91st Street and South Memorial Drive. The tract is described as Lots 5 and 6, Block 2, 9100 Memorial.
South Pointe Chevrolet has been operating its dealership on Lot 5 for over six years. It expanded its operation to the south onto Lot 2 in July of 1994 for a parking lot for display of new and pre-owned automobiles. South Pointe Chevrolet currently proposes to expand its operation in the service area.
The proposed amendment is to add 16,000 SF to the existing facility on Lot 5. The additional building square footage would include a new service write-up area for 24 service bays. The new addition would be extending into Lot 6.
The new additions would displace existing parking spaces. This would necessitate a reconfiguration of the existing parking areas and the addition of 62 parking spaces on the undeveloped portion of Lot 6.
As a result of the reconfiguration of the parking areas, 10,551 SF of landscaped area would be lost. The result will leave 28,125 SF of landscaped area for Lots 5 and 6. The landscaped area will be 12.3% of net land area, exceeding the 7% requirement established in PUD-405 approval in November 1985.
Staff finds the uses and intensities of development proposed and as modified by staff to be in harmony with the spirit and intent of the Code. Based on the following conditions, staff finds PUD-405-H, as modified by staff, to be: (1) consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; (2) in harmony with the existing and expected development of surrounding areas; (3) a unified treatment of the development possibilities of the site; and (4) consistent with the stated purposes and standards of the PUD Chapter of the Zoning Code.
Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL of PUD-405-H subject to the following conditions:
Land Area (net) 5.25 Acres
Maximum Building Floor Area 48,051 SF
Maximum Building Height 35 FT or Two-stories
Minimum Parking Spaces 374
Net Landscaped Area 28,125 SF or 12.3%
Except as above modified, the development standards of PUD-405, as amended, shall remain applicable.
There were no interested parties wishing to speak.
Applicant’s Comments:
Mr. Wayne Alberty, 201 West 5th Street, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103, stated that he is in agreement with the staff recommendation.
TMAPC Action; 9 members present:
On MOTION of HORNER, the TMAPC voted 9-0-0 (Carnes, Collins, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Pace "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Boyle, Westervelt "absent") to recommend APPROVAL of the major amendment for PUD-405-H as recommended by staff.
Legal Description for PUD-405-H:
Lots 5
and 6, Block 2, 9100 Memorial Addition, an addition to the City of Tulsa,
County of Tulsa, State of Oklahoma, from
PUD-405-G to PUD-405-H (Planned Unit Development).
* * * * * * * * * * * *
ZONING
PUBLIC HEARING
Application No.: pud-355-b major amendment
Applicant: Ricky Jones (PD-18)
(CD-8)
Location: North
and west of the northwest corner of East 91st Street and South Yale
Avenue
Staff Recommendation:
Mr. Stump informed the Planning Commission that the applicant has
requested a continuance to June 7, 2000.
Staff had no objection to the continuance.
There were no interested parties wishing to speak.
TMAPC Action; 9
members present:
On MOTION of HORNER, the TMAPC voted 9-0-0 (Carnes, Collins, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Pace "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Boyle, Westervelt "absent") to CONTINUE the major amendment for PUD-355-B to June 7, 2000 at 1:30 p.m.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
OTHER
BUSINESS:
Application No.: pud-360-a detail site plan
Applicant: Jerry Ledford, Jr. (PD-18)
(CD-8)
Location: West
and north of the northwest corner of 91st Street South and Memorial
Drive
Staff Recommendation:
The Detail Site Plan is for an 8,250 SF Dollar General Store in Development Area 2-C. Staff has reviewed the site plan and finds that it complies with the PUD development standards. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL of the Detail Site Plan for PUD-360-A, subject to the following condition:
An acceptable detail of the screening surrounding the bulk trash container is provided.
There were no interested parties wishing to speak.
The applicant
indicated his agreement with staff’s recommendation.
TMAPC Action; 9 members present:
On MOTION of CARNES, the TMAPC voted 8-0-1 (Carnes, Collins, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Jackson, Midget, Pace "aye"; no "nays"; Ledford ”abstaining"; Boyle, Westervelt "absent") to APPROVE the detail site plan for PUD-360-A subject to conditions as recommended by staff.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
There being no further business, the 2nd Vice Chairman declared the meeting adjourned at 1:45 p.m.
Date approved:______________
__________________________
Chairman
ATTEST:___________________________
Secretary
TOP OF PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS HOME