Tulsa Metropolitan Area Planning Commission
Wednesday, July 19, 2000
1:30 p.m.
Francis Campbell City
Council Room
Plaza Level, Tulsa Civic
Center
Members Present Members
Absent Staff Present Others Present
Boyle Pace Bruce Jackere, Legal
Carnes Dunlap Counsel
Collins Huntsinger Boulden, Legal
Harmon Stump Counsel
Hill
Horner
Jackson
Ledford
Midget
Westervelt
The notice and agenda of said meeting were posted in the Reception Area of the INCOG offices on Friday, July 14, 2000 at 3:35 p.m., posted in the Office of the City Clerk at 3:30 a.m., as well as in the office of the County Clerk at 3:24 a.m.
After declaring a quorum present, Chair Westervelt called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m.
Minutes:
Approval of the
minutes of June 21, 2000 Meeting No. 2242
On MOTION of BOYLE the TMAPC voted 9-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes, Collins, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Westervelt “aye”; no “nays”; none “abstaining”; Midget, Pace “absent“) to APPROVE the minutes of the meeting of June 21, 2000 Meeting No. 2242 as amended by the TMAPC.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
REPORTS:
Chairman’s Reports:
Mr. Westervelt announced that the applicant has withdrawn the preliminary
plat for GreenHill II.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
CONTINUED ITEMS:
The Meadows Second – (2992) (PD-9)
(County)
East of South 61st West Avenue and West 42nd Place
South
TMAPC Comments:
Mr. Westervelt stated that there has been a timely request for a
continuance to August 2, 2000.
There were no interested parties wishing to speak.
TMAPC Action; 9
members present:
On MOTION of BOYLE, the TMAPC voted 9-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes, Collins, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Midget, Pace "absent") to CONTINUE the preliminary plat for the Meadows Second to August 2, 2000 at 1:30 p.m.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
Application No.: PUD-502-A MAJOR
AMENDMENT
Applicant: Jeffrey Levinson (PD-18)
(CD-8)
Location: West
of southwest corner of East 91st Street and South Yale Avenue
TMAPC Comments:
Mr. Westervelt stated that the applicant would like a continuance in
order to work out some details.
There were no interested parties wishing to speak.
TMAPC Action; 9
members present:
On MOTION of BOYLE, the TMAPC voted 8-0-1 (Boyle, Carnes, Collins, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Jackson, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; Ledford ”abstaining"; Midget, Pace "absent") to CONTINUE the major amendment for PUD-501-A to August 2, 2000 at 1:30 p.m.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
Committee Reports:
Mr. Boyle reported that the committee had a good meeting today on changes to enact some of the materials that the Infill Development Task Force recommended to the Planning Commission. He stated that the committee would continue to study the proposed changes and have additional meetings.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
Director’s Report:
Mr. Stump stated that there are several items on the City Council agenda for July 20, 2000.
Mr. Stump stated that a draft resolution prepared by the City Council/Public Works Committee would be considered next Tuesday, July 25, 2000 at the 8:00 a.m. meeting. He indicated that the draft resolution concerns the Riverside Drive Studies and the Planning Commission might want to review the draft resolution in case there are any comments that would need to be forwarded to the committee.
Mr. Stump reported that the TMAPC receipts for the month of May are a little below average and staff is seeing a slight slow down from a very busy spring.
Mr. Boyle stated that he is glad that the City Council is finally confronting the Riverside Drive Studies issue. Mr. Boyle further stated that staff should explain to the City Council that the Planning Commission would expect this to be an expeditious process.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
Mr. Midget in at 1:35 p.m.
SUBDIVISIONS
LOT-SPLITS FOR WAIVER OF SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS:
L-19074 – Sack & Associates, Inc. (983) (PD-18) (CD-8)
3830 East 76th
Street South
Staff Recommendation:
The applicant has applied to split a single tract into three parcels, with each of the new parcels being tied to an adjacent tract. The proposed configuration will result with Tract A having six side-lot lines; Tract B having seven side-lot lines; and Tract C having four side-lot lines. The applicant is seeking a waiver of Subdivision Regulations that each tract has no more than three side-lot lines.
The Technical Advisory Committee expressed no concerns about the proposed lot-split at their July 6, 2000, meeting. Staff believes this lot-split would not have an adverse effect on the surrounding properties and would therefore recommend APPROVAL of the waiver of Subdivision Regulations and of the lot-split.
Applicant’s Comments:
Richard Blisset, 3830 East
76th Street South, stated that he owns the subject property, which
is a heavily-wooded lot with limited access.
He explained that a driveway would be a 20% grade, which would be
impossible to build in.
Mr. Blisset stated that he decided to share the subject property with his
neighbors and keep the green space. He indicated
that all three neighbors have agreed to this lot-split.
Interested Parties
Comments:
Barbara Mugge, 3818 East
76th Street, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74136, stated that she lives west of
the subject lot and is in support of this application.
TMAPC Action; 10 members present:
On MOTION of BOYLE, the
TMAPC voted 10-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes,
Collins, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Westervelt
"aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Pace
"absent") to APPROVE of the waiver of Subdivision Regulations and
the lot-split as recommended by staff.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
LOT-SPLITS FOR RATIFICATION OF PRIOR APPROVAL:
L-18062 – Michael Marrara (983) (PD-18) (CD-8)
404 East 76th Street
L-18069 – J.
Anthony Miller (2283) (PD-18)
(CD-8)
9141 South Yale
L-19084 – Michael
Marrara (3203) (PD-3)
(CD-3)
2921 Dawson Road
L-19085 – Toby
Powell (2702) (PD-11)
(CD-1)
1218 West Queen
Staff Recommendation:
Mr. Stump stated that all of these lot-splits are in order and staff
recommends APPROVAL.
TMAPC Action; 10 members present:
On MOTION of BOYLE, the TMAPC voted 10-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes, Collins, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Pace "absent") to RATIFY these lot-splits given prior approval, finding them in accordance with Subdivision Regulations as recommended by staff.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
FINAL PLAT:
Plainview Heights Addition Amended – (PUD 618)
(594) (PD-17) CD-6)
422 South 129th
East Avenue
Staff Recommendation:
Mr. Stump stated that everything is order and all release letters have
been received. Staff recommends APPROVAL
of the final plat for Plainview Height Addition Amended.
TMAPC Action; 10 members present:
On MOTION of HORNER, the
TMAPC voted 10-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes,
Collins, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Westervelt
"aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Pace
"absent") to APPROVE the final plat for Plainview Heights
Addition Amended as recommended by staff.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
Tulsa Dream Center – (1402) (PD-25)
(County)
South side of West 46th
Street, west of North Cincinnati Avenue
Staff Recommendation:
Mr. Stump stated that
everything is order and all release letters have been received. Staff recommends APPROVAL of the
final plat for Tulsa Dream Center as recommended by staff.
There were no interested parties wishing to speak.
TMAPC Action; 10 members present:
On MOTION of BOYLE, the TMAPC voted 10-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes, Collins, Harmon,
Hill, Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Westervelt "aye"; no
"nays"; none ”abstaining"; Pace "absent") to APPROVE the final plat for Tulsa Dream Center as recommended by staff.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
PLAT WAIVER:
BOA 18780 - (593) (PD-4) (CD-4)
North of East 4th
Place, east of South Florence Avenue
Staff Recommendation:
Staff Comments and
Recommendation:
The property is already platted and the checklist is “clean” except the required dedication of additional right-of-way. We can see no additional benefit to the public by requiring a re-plat. Staff recommends approval of the plat waiver subject to the required dedication of additional right-of-way.
A YES answer to the following 3
questions would generally be FAVORABLE to a plat waiver:
YES NO
1) Has property previously been platted? √ *
2) Are restrictive covenants contained in a previously filed plat? √ *
3) Is property adequately described by surrounding platted
properties or street R/W? √ *
A YES answer to the remaining questions
would generally NOT be favorable to a plat waiver:
4) Is right-of-way dedication required to comply with Major Street
and Highway Plan? √1 *
5) Would restrictive covenants or deeds of dedication be needed
by separate instrument? √1 *
6) Infrastructure requirements
a) Water
i) Is a main line water extension required? * √
ii) Is an internal system or fire line required? * √
iii) Are additional easements required? * √
b) Sanitary Sewer
i) Is a main line extension required? * √
ii) Is an internal system required? * √
iii) Are additional easements required? * √
c) Storm Sewer
i) Is a P.F.P.I. required? * √
ii) Is an Overland Drainage Easement required? * √
iii) Is on-site detention required? * √
iv) Are additional easements required? * √
7) Floodplain
a) Does the property contain a City of Tulsa (Regulatory)
Floodplain? * √
b) Does the property contain a F.E.M.A. (Federal) Floodplain? * √
8) Change of Access
a) Are revisions to existing access locations necessary? * √
9) Is the property in a P.U.D.? * √
a) If yes, was plat recorded for the original P.U.D.? N/A
10) Is this a Major Amendment to a P.U.D.? * √
a) If yes, does the amendment make changes to the
proposed physical development of the
P.U.D.? N/A
11) Are additional utility easements needed? * √
There were no interested parties wishing to speak.
The applicant
indicated his agreement with staff’s recommendation.
TMAPC Action; 10 members present:
On MOTION of CARNES, the
TMAPC voted 10-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes,
Collins, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Westervelt
"aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Pace
"absent") to APPROVE the plat waiver for BOA-18780, subject to the
required dedication of additional right-of-way
as recommended by staff.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
Z-4289 - (1694) (PD-17) (CD-6)
Northwest corner East 31st
Street and South 145th East Avenue
Staff Recommendation:
Staff Comments and Recommendation:
The project consists of erection of a monopole tower for a wireless telephone antenna. There would be no other construction and no need for water, sanitary sewer, or streets. Because of the nature of the use, staff administratively waived formal TAC review and recommends approval of the plat waiver.
A YES answer
to the following 3 questions would generally be FAVORABLE to a plat waiver:
YES NO
1) Has property previously been platted? * √
2) Are restrictive covenants contained in a previously filed plat? * √
3) Is property adequately described by surrounding platted
properties or street R/W? * √
A YES answer
to the remaining questions would generally NOT be favorable to a plat waiver:
4) Is right-of-way dedication required to comply with Major Street
and Highway Plan? * √
5) Would restrictive covenants or deeds of dedication be
needed by separate instrument? * √
6) Infrastructure requirements
a) Water
i) Is a main line water extension required? * √
ii) Is an internal system or fire line required? * √
iii) Are additional easements required? * √
b) Sanitary Sewer
i) Is a main line extension required? * √
ii) Is an internal system required? * √
iii) Are additional easements required? * √
c) Storm Sewer
i) Is a P.F.P.I. required? * √
ii) Is an Overland Drainage Easement required? * √
iii) Is on-site detention required? * √
iv) Are additional easements required? * √
7) Floodplain
a) Does the property contain a City of Tulsa (Regulatory)
Floodplain? * √
b) Does the property contain a F.E.M.A. (Federal) Floodplain? * √
8) Change of Access
a) Are revisions to existing access locations necessary? * √
9) Is the property in a P.U.D.? * √
a) If yes, was plat recorded for the original P.U.D.? N/A
10) Is this a Major Amendment to a P.U.D.? * √
a) If yes, does the amendment make changes to the
proposed physical development of the
P.U.D.? N/A
11) Are additional utility easements needed? * √
There were no interested parties wishing to speak.
The applicant
indicated his agreement with staff’s recommendation.
TMAPC Action; 10 members present:
On MOTION of MIDGET, the TMAPC voted 10-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes, Collins, Harmon,
Hill, Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Westervelt "aye"; no
"nays"; none ”abstaining"; Pace "absent") to APPROVE the plat waiver for Z-4289 as recommended by staff.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
BOA 18798 - (293) (PD-5) (CD-3)
280 South Memorial,
northwest corner of South Memorial Drive and 4th Place South
Staff Recommendation:
PURPOSE:
The purpose of the request is to allow the change in use of a facility currently occupied by the East Tulsa Christian Church. The proposed use is a math, science and technology school.
The church will vacate the premises on July 1; the school will start classes under a timeframe that coincides with Tulsa public schools.
No exterior construction will be required to facilitate the change in use.
GENERAL:
The site is approximately 6.2 acres in size, is zoned OL and includes church facilities. It abuts single-family homes on the west, OL zoning and uses to the north, CS and RM-2 zoning and uses across Memorial to the east, OL zoning and uses to the southeast across 4th Place and RM-2 and CS zoning and use, also across 4th Place to the south.
STREETS:
The site is bounded on the east by Memorial Drive and on the south by 4th Place.
Existing access is indicated off of Memorial and 4th Place.
Memorial Drive right-of-way is indicated at 60’ on the west side of the centerline; 4th Place is indicated at 50’. It also appears that existing dedications along Memorial bring it to 50’; 10’ remains to be dedicated. Dedications along 4th Place are not addressed by the plat.
SEWER:
Sewer currently serves the existing facility.
WATER:
Water currently serves the existing facility.
STORM
DRAIN:
Staff does not have information regarding drainage/detention – no new construction is anticipated.
UTILITIES:
Staff does not have information regarding utility easements.
Staff provides the following comments from
the TAC meeting.
1. Streets:
·
Somdecerff,
Streets, no comment
·
French,
Traffic, indicated that a left turn bay on the northern driveway would be
helpful – not a requirement.
2. Sewer:
·
Bolding,
Public Works, no comment
3. Water:
·
Murphree,
Public Works, no comment
4. Storm Drain:
·
McCormick,
Stormwater, no comment.
5. Utilities
·
No comment.
Conclusions:
Based on the TAC discussion, the lack of comment and the following checklist, which reflects the policies of TMAPC. Staff recommends approval of plat waiver.
It shall be the policy of
the Tulsa Metropolitan Area Planning Commission that all requests for plat
waivers shall be evaluated by the staff and by the Technical Advisory Committee
based on the following list. After such evaluation, TMAPC Staff shall make a
recommendation to the TMAPC as to the merits of the plat waiver request
accompanied by the answers to these questions:
A YES answer
to the following 3 questions would generally be FAVORABLE to a plat waiver:
Y N
1) Has property previously been platted? o 4
2) Are there restrictive covenants contained in a previously
filed plat? o 4
3) Is property adequately described by surrounding platted
properties or street R/W? 4 o
A YES answer to the remaining questions
would generally NOT be favorable to a plat waiver:
4) Is right-of-way dedication required to comply with major
street and highway plan? o 4
5) Will restrictive covenants be filed by separate instrument? o 4
6) Infrastructure requirements
a) Water
i) Is a main line water extension required? o 4
ii) Is an internal system or fire line required? o 4
iv) Are additional easements required? o 4
b) Sanitary Sewer
i) Is a main line extension required? o 4
ii) Is an internal system required? o 4
iii) Are additional easements required? o 4
c) Storm Sewer
i) Is a P.F.P.I. required? o 4
ii) Is an Overland Drainage Easement required? o 4
iii) Is on-site detention required? o 4
iv) Are additional easements required? o