Tulsa Metropolitan Area Planning Commission

Minutes of Meeting No. 2252

Wednesday, September 27, 2000 1:30 p.m.

Francis Campbell City Council Room

Plaza Level, Tulsa Civic Center

 

Members Present      Members Absent     Staff Present      Others Present

Boyle                                Collins                           Beach                      Boulden, Legal

Carnes                                                                    Bruce                          Counsel

Harmon                                                                   Dunlap                    

Hill                                                                            Huntsinger

Horner                                                                     Matthews

Jackson                                                                  Stump

Ledford

Midget

Pace

Westervelt

 

 

The notice and agenda of said meeting were posted in the Reception Area of the INCOG offices on Monday, September 25, 2000 at 9:30 a.m., posted in the Office of the City Clerk at 9:21 a.m., as well as in the office of the County Clerk at 9:16 a.m.

 

After declaring a quorum present, Chair Westervelt called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m.

 

REPORTS:

Chairman’s Reports:

Mr. Westervelt reported that there is a workshop in November and he would like as many of the Planning Commissioners to go as possible.

 

Mr. Westervelt announced that the Budget and Work Program Committee is scheduled for a worksession immediately following the TMAPC meeting.  He informed the Planning Commission that based on what time the regular TMAPC meeting is over will decide whether there will be a worksession.  It may need to be continued to another date.

 


 

CONTINUED ITEMS:

Application No.:  PUD-559-A-2                                 Minor amendment

Applicant:  Mark Reentz                                                                 (PD-18) (CD-8)

Location:      North and east of northeast corner of East 91st Street and South Mingo.

 

Mr. Westervelt announced that there has been a timely request for a continuance to October 4, 2000.

 

There were no interested parties wishing to speak.

 

TMAPC Action; 10 members present:

On MOTION of BOYLE, the TMAPC voted 10-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Pace, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Collins "absent") to CONTINUE the minor amendment for PUD-559-A-2 to October 4, 2000.

 

* * * * * * * * * * * *

 

 

Application No.:  Z-5620-SP-10                                 corridor site plan

Applicant:  Ted Sack, Sack & Associates                                      (PD-18) (CD-8)

Location:      East of southeast corner of East 91st Street and South Memorial.

 

Mr. Westervelt stated that there is a request for a continuance to October 4, 2000.

 

There were no interested parties wishing to speak.

 

TMAPC Action; 10 members present:

On MOTION of HILL, the TMAPC voted 10-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Pace, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Collins "absent") to CONTINUE the corridor site plan for Z-5620-SP-10 to October 4, 2000.

 

* * * * * * * * * * * *

 

 


SUBDIVISIONS

FINAL PLAT:

The Gates at Forest Park (2783)                                                 (PD-26) (CD-8)

¼ mile north of the northwest corner of 111th and Sheridan

 

Staff Recommendation:

Mr. Bruce stated that all of the release letters have been received and everything is in order.  Staff recommends APPROVAL of the final plat for The Gates at Forest Park.

 

The applicant indicated his agreement with staff’s recommendation.

 

There were no interested parties wishing to speak.

 

TMAPC Action; 10 members present:

On MOTION of MIDGET, the TMAPC voted 10-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Pace, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Collins "absent") to APPROVE the final plat for The Gates at Forest Park as recommended by staff.

 

* * * * * * * * * * * *

 

 

PRELIMINARY PLAT:

Oil Capital Federal Credit Union (PUD-630) (3393)                (PD-18) (CD-7)

South side of 51st Street South, between Oswego and Richmond

 

Staff Recommendation:

 

GENERAL

The site is located on the south side of 51st Street between Harvard and Yale.  It is in an area of existing residences and offices.  There are deadends on 51st Place into the site from both the east and the west.

 

ZONING

The site is zoned OL and RS-2 with the OL designation on the northern 160’ of the platted area and the RS-2 on the remainder in the south.  The site is bounded on the east by OL and RS-2 zoning and on the west by OM and RD.  RS-2 zoning abuts the site on the south.

 

The PUD covers the area between 51st Street and 51st Place and allows the uses allowed by right in the OL district and drive-in banking facilities.

 


STREETS

The site will be accessed from 51st Street.  The plat indicates entries at the east and west boundaries.  The plat does not propose to connect 51st Place in the southern third of the site.

 

SANITARY SEWER

Sanitary sewer is present along the east lot line of the lots to the east of the site.  It stubs west of the project on the north lot line of the lots facing 51st Place South.

 

WATER

Water is present along the south side of 51st Place, stubbing at the east and west boundaries of the site.

 

STORM DRAIN

Staff does not have drainage/detention information.

 

UTILITIES

A 17.5’ perimeter easement is shown.

 

Staff provides the following comments from the TAC meeting.

1.      Streets/access:

 

2.      Sewer:

·        Bolding, PW/Engineering, indicated that an extension would be required to serve the site.

3.      Water:

·        Murphree, PW/Water, indicated that more information was required, particularly regarding configuration and use.

·        Caulkins, Fire, commented on the site plan and indicated that the size of the radius in the southwest corner of the parking area should be increased to allow movement of fire trucks and that the dumpster location should be changed.

4.      Storm Drainage:

·        McCormick, Stormwater, indicated that detention would be required with standard easements.


5.      Utilities:

·        Nelson, Valor (written), requested that the covenants in paragraph 1.4.2 cover all utilities and that paragraph 1.1.6. not exclude gas.

 

Additional Staff comments:

The applicant has indicated that he intends to construct the bank and to sell two lots south of 51st Place for residential purposes.

 

It appears from the PUD file and the minutes of the PUD/zoning hearing that there was significant discussion regarding the completion of 51st Place.  Public concern appears to have centered on the concern over office traffic on the street.  Public Works has indicated that the street should be completed.  TMAPC Staff is of the opinion that two waivers of Subdivision Regulations will be required should the Commission elect to allow a stub.  The first waiver would be to allow an over-length cul-de-sac; the second would to deviate from the logical extension of streets.

 

Should this street be stubbed staff would recommend turnarounds on both ends.  This may be as expensive as extending the street, based on the amount of extra material required to construct sufficient radius on the head of the cul-de-sac.

 

In the alternative a limits-of-no-access (LNA) should be placed along the north right-of-way of the street eliminating traffic to and from the office complex.  Screening fences should be considered.

 

Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject to the following:

 

Waivers of Subdivision Regulations:

1.      None needed.

 

Special Conditions:

1.       Standard dedications on 51st Street.

2.      Through-connection of 51st Place with Limits of No Access (LNA) along northern right-of-way.

3.      On-site detention and appropriate easements.

4.      Sewer and water extensions and easements to the satisfaction of Public Works.

 

Standard Conditions:

1.      Utility easements shall meet the approval of the utilities.  Coordinate with Subsurface Committee if underground plant is planned.  Show additional easements as required.  Existing easements shall be tied to or related to property line and/or lot lines.

 


2.      Water and sanitary sewer plans shall be approved by the Public Works Department  prior to release of final plat.  (Include language for W/S facilities in covenants.)

 

3.      Pavement or landscape repair within restricted water line, sewer line, or utility easements as a result of water or sewer line or other utility repairs due to breaks and failures, shall be borne by the owner(s) of the lot(s).

 

4.      Any request for creation of a Sewer Improvement District shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to release of final plat.

 

5.      Paving and/or drainage plans (as required) shall be approved by the Public Works Department.

 

6.      Any request for a Privately Financed Public Improvement (PFPI) shall be submitted to the Public Works Department.

 

7.      A topo map shall be submitted for review by TAC (Subdivision Regulations).  (Submit with drainage plans as directed.)

 

 

8.      Street names shall be approved by the Public Works Department and shown on plat.

 

9.      All curve data, including corner radii, shall be shown on final plat as applicable.

 

10. Bearings, or true N/S, etc., shall be shown on perimeter of land being platted or other bearings as directed by the Public Works Department.

 

11. All adjacent streets, intersections and/or widths thereof shall be shown on plat.

 

12. It is recommended that the developer coordinate with the Public Works Department during the early stages of street construction concerning the ordering, purchase and installation of street marker signs.  (Advisory, not a condition for plat release.)

 

13. It is recommended that the applicant and/or his engineer or developer coordinate with the Tulsa City/County Health Department for solid waste disposal, particularly during the construction phase and/or clearing of the project.  Burning of solid waste is prohibited.

 

14. The owner(s) shall provide the following information on sewage disposal system if it is to be privately operated on each lot: type, size and general location.  (This information to be included in restrictive covenants on plat.)


15. All lots, streets, building lines, easements, etc., shall be completely dimensioned.

 

16. The key or location map shall be complete.

 

17. A Corporation Commission letter, Certificate of Non-Development, or other records as may be on file, shall be provided concerning any oil and/or gas wells before plat is released.  (A building line shall be shown on plat on any wells not officially plugged.  If plugged, provide plugging records.)

 

18. A "Letter of Assurance" regarding installation of improvements shall be provided prior to release of final plat.  (Including documents required under 3.6.5 Subdivision Regulations.)

 

19. Applicant is advised to of his responsibility to contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding Section 404 of the Clean Waters Act.

 

20. If the owner is a Limited Liability Corporation (L.L.C.), a letter from an attorney stating that the L.L.C. is properly organized to do business in Oklahoma is required.

 

21. All other Subdivision Regulations shall be met prior to release of final plat.

 

Interested Parties Comments:

Doris Graham, 4224 East 51st Place, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74135, stated that she is an adjacent property owner to the subject property.  Ms. Graham indicated that she would prefer that the street not be opened on 51st Place.

 

Ms. Graham stated that she is willing to have the street open on one side, but not all the way across.

 

TMAPC Comments:

Mr. Boyle asked Ms. Graham why she didn’t want the street to go all the way through.  In response, Ms. Graham stated that she didn’t want additional traffic.  Mr. Boyle asked Ms. Graham if the subject area is a heavy traffic area today.  In response, Ms. Graham answered negatively.  Mr. Boyle asked Ms. Graham why she thought the opening of the street would remarkably increase the traffic to a point that is unreasonable.  In response, Ms. Graham stated that she couldn’t judge that until it happens.

 

TMAPC Action; 10 members present:

On MOTION of BOYLE, the TMAPC voted 10-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Pace, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Collins "absent") to APPROVE the preliminary plat for Oil Capital Federal Credit Union subject to special conditions and standard conditions as recommended by staff.


Mr. Westervelt out at 1:46 p.m.

 

QuikTrip Corporate Campus (PUD-635) (2894)                      (PD-17) (CD-6)

4600 Block of South 129th East Avenue, east side.

 

Staff Recommendation:

GENERAL

The site is bounded on the north by single-family residences (Quail Ridge Addition) on the east and on the southeast by vacant land, on the south by office use and on the west by 51st Street. The site generally drains north to south, away from the addition.

 

ZONING

The site is currently located in the AG district. The proposed zoning change/PUD would amend the zoning to the OL with PUD overlay.  The proposed PUD allows those uses that are allowed by right in the OL district.  The PUD will be heard by the Commission on August 16.

 

STREETS

The site is bounded on the west by 129th East Avenue.  The plat indicates three access points onto 129th.  Two streets extend from the north at the north boundary of the site.  The PUD site plan does not indicate any ties to or extensions of these streets. The plat does not indicate limits of no access.

 

The plat does not give any indication of the size of the private loop street.

 

WATER

The conceptual layout from the PUD indicates that water will be brought from the north (132 Place) and the west (line along 129th East Avenue).

 

SEWER

Sanitary sewer will tie to the existing stub at 129th East Avenue in the central portion of the site.

 

STORM DRAIN

The site will drain to areas A and B. It is not clear from the site plan how the water from the north will be received and transmitted to the reserve areas.

 

UTILITIES

Easements are not shown on the plat.

 

Staff provides the following comments from the TAC meeting.

1.   Streets/access:

2.      Sewer:

·        Bolding, PW/Engineering: will require easements and extension from the existing stub.

3.      Water:

·        Murphree, PW/Water: 20’ dedicated water easements will be required.

4.      Storm Drainage:

·        McCormick, Stormwater: indicated that maintenance easements and easements over the reserve areas will be required.

5.      Utilities:

·        No comments.

 

Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject to the following:

 

Waivers of Subdivision Regulations:

1.   None needed.

 

Special Conditions:

1    Align access points with median breaks to satisfaction of Public Works.

2.   Provide PFPI for median revisions at northern access.

3.   Provide drainage easements to satisfaction of Public Works.

 

Standard Conditions:

1.   Utility easements shall meet the approval of the utilities. Coordinate with Subsurface Committee if underground plant is planned. Show additional easements as required. Existing easements shall be tied to or related to property line and/or lot lines.

 

2.   Water and sanitary sewer plans shall be approved by the Public Works Department prior to release of final plat.  (Include language for W/S facilities in covenants.)

 

6.      Pavement or landscape repair within restricted water line, sewer line, or utility easements as a result of water or sewer line or other utility repairs due to breaks and failures, shall be borne by the owner(s) of the lot(s).

 

7.      Any request for creation of a Sewer Improvement District shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to release of final plat.

 

8.      Paving and/or drainage plans (as required) shall be approved by the Public Works Department.

 


9.      Any request for a Privately Financed Public Improvement (PFPI) shall be submitted to the Public Works Department.

 

10. A topo map shall be submitted for review by TAC (Subdivision Regulations).  (Submit with drainage plans as directed.)

 

11. Street names shall be approved by the Public Works Department and shown on plat.

 

12. All curve data, including corner radii, shall be shown on final plat as applicable.

 

13. Bearings, or true N/S, etc., shall be shown on perimeter of land being platted or other bearings as directed by the Public Works Department.

 

14. All adjacent streets, intersections and/or widths thereof shall be shown on plat.

 

15. It is recommended that the developer coordinate with the Public Works Department during the early stages of street construction concerning the ordering, purchase and installation of street marker signs.  (Advisory, not a condition for plat release.)

 

16. It is recommended that the applicant and/or his engineer or developer coordinate with the Tulsa City/County Health Department for solid waste disposal, particularly during the construction phase and/or clearing of the project.  Burning of solid waste is prohibited.

 

17. The owner(s) shall provide the following information on sewage disposal system if it is to be privately operated on each lot: type, size and general location.  (This information to be included in restrictive covenants on plat.)

 

18. All lots, streets, building lines, easements, etc., shall be completely dimensioned.

 

19. The key or location map shall be complete.

 

20. A Corporation Commission letter, Certificate of Non-Development, or other records as may be on file, shall be provided concerning any oil and/or gas wells before plat is released.  (A building line shall be shown on plat on any wells not officially plugged.  If plugged, provide plugging records.)

 

21. A "Letter of Assurance" regarding installation of improvements shall be provided prior to release of final plat.  (Including documents required under 3.6.5 Subdivision Regulations.)

 


22. Applicant is advised to of his responsibility to contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding Section 404 of the Clean Waters Act.

 

23. If the owner is a Limited Liability Corporation (L.L.C.), a letter from an attorney stating that the L.L.C. is properly organized to do business in Oklahoma is required.

 

24. All other Subdivision Regulations shall be met prior to release of final plat.

 

Applicant’s Comments:

Ted Sack, 111 South Elgin Avenue, Tulsa Oklahoma 74120, stated that he is in agreement with staff’s recommendation; however, as a matter of record, the subject property is being purchased as part of an overall tract that is 160 acres.  There are 80 acres to the east of the subject property, which is included in this project.  An easement will be granted over to the 80 acres in order to provide sewer.  He explained that this is an agreement he had with the Mayo Family and it was not clear on the TAC recommendation.

 

There were no interested parties wishing to speak.

 

TMAPC Action; 9 members present:

On MOTION of HORNER, the TMAPC voted 9-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Pace, "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Collins, Westervelt "absent") to APPROVE the preliminary plat for QuikTrip Corporate Campus, subject to the special conditions and the standard conditions as recommended by staff.

 

* * * * * * * * * * * *

 

 

Mr. Westervelt in at 1:50 p.m.

 

Burgundy Place (PUD-346-A) (1783)                                         (PD-18) (CD-2)

Southeast corner of East 88th Street South and South Lewis Avenue

 

Staff Recommendation:

GENERAL

The site is located east of Lewis Avenue, south of 88th Street. The proposed addition is a resubdivision of lots 1 and 2 of block 1 of Lewis Center East and lots 1 and 2 of block 5 of the Crown Imperial Addition, creating one lot in one block.

 

The site currently contains the Burgundy Place Retirement Center, a ten story, 133-unit elderly housing structure with congregate kitchen attached. The purpose of the expansion is to facilitate the construction of an 84-unit assisted living center and Alzheimer care facility.


ZONING

The site is zoned CS with PUD. The tract that is being added is also zoned CS and will be part of the PUD. The subject site is bounded by RM-1 zoning and uses to the northeast, CS zoning and uses to the north across 88th Street, Lewis Avenue on the west with hotel beyond, CS zoning and uses to the south and vacant land zoned IL to the east.

 

The amendment to the PUD allows 52,512 square feet of Alzheimer’s facility. (Note: floor area was approved at 82,612 SF per the hearing of 8/16.)

 

STREETS

East 88th Street bounds the site on the north; Lewis bounds it on the west. The plat indicates one access point onto Lewis and does not indicate either access or LNA along 88th. Lewis and 88th are shown at their ultimate widths; the plat does not reference previous dedications.

 

SANITARY SEWER

Sanitary sewer is located along the north boundary and through the central portion of the site.

 

WATER

Water is present along east side of Lewis and the south side of 88th Street.

 

STORM DRAIN

A storm drain easement is located in the southeast corner of the site. 

 

UTILITIES

Easements of varying widths are located around the perimeter of the site.

 

Staff provides the following comments from the TAC meeting.

1.   Streets/access:

2.   Sewer:

·        Bolding, PW/engineering: indicated potential relocation might be required, depending on building location.

3.   Water:

·        Murphree, PW/water: no comments

4.   Storm Drainage:

·        McCormick, Stormwater: requested additional coordination to clarify easements along the southern boundary.

5.       Utilities:

·        No utility providers were present.

 

Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject to the following:

 


Waivers of Subdivision Regulations:

1.   None needed.

 

Special Conditions:

1.   Provide 30’ radius return at SE/C 88th and Lewis.

2.   Relocate sanitary sewer to satisfaction of Public Works.

3.   Clarify storm drainage easements to satisfaction of Public Works.

 

Standard Conditions:

1.   Utility easements shall meet the approval of the utilities. Coordinate with Subsurface Committee if underground plant is planned. Show additional easements as required. Existing easements shall be tied to or related to property line and/or lot lines.

 

2.   Water and sanitary sewer plans shall be approved by the Public Works Department prior to release of final plat.  (Include language for W/S facilities in covenants.)

 

3.   Pavement or landscape repair within restricted water line, sewer line, or utility easements as a result of water or sewer line or other utility repairs due to breaks and failures, shall be borne by the owner(s) of the lot(s).

 

4.   Any request for creation of a Sewer Improvement District shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to release of final plat.

 

5.   Paving and/or drainage plans (as required) shall be approved by the Public Works Department.

 

6.       Any request for a Privately Financed Public Improvement (PFPI) shall be submitted to the Public Works Department.

 

7.       A topo map shall be submitted for review by TAC (Subdivision Regulations).  (Submit with drainage plans as directed.)

 

8.       Street names shall be approved by the Public Works Department and shown on plat.

 

9.       All curve data, including corner radii, shall be shown on final plat as applicable.

 

10.   Bearings, or true N/S, etc., shall be shown on perimeter of land being platted or other bearings as directed by the Public Works Department.

 

11.   All adjacent streets, intersections and/or widths thereof shall be shown on plat.


12.   It is recommended that the developer coordinate with the Public Works Department during the early stages of street construction concerning the ordering, purchase and installation of street marker signs.  (Advisory, not a condition for plat release.)

 

13.   It is recommended that the applicant and/or his engineer or developer coordinate with the Tulsa City/County Health Department for solid waste disposal, particularly during the construction phase and/or clearing of the project.  Burning of solid waste is prohibited.

 

14.   The owner(s) shall provide the following information on sewage disposal system if it is to be privately operated on each lot: type, size and general location.  (This information to be included in restrictive covenants on plat.)

 

15.   All lots, streets, building lines, easements, etc., shall be completely dimensioned.

 

16.   The key or location map shall be complete.

 

17.   A Corporation Commission letter, Certificate of Non-Development, or other records as may be on file, shall be provided concerning any oil and/or gas wells before plat is released.  (A building line shall be shown on plat on any wells not officially plugged.  If plugged, provide plugging records.)

 

18.   A "Letter of Assurance" regarding installation of improvements shall be provided prior to release of final plat.  (Including documents required under 3.6.5 Subdivision Regulations.)

 

19.   Applicant is advised to of his responsibility to contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding Section 404 of the Clean Waters Act.

 

20.   If the owner is a Limited Liability Corporation (L.L.C.), a letter from an attorney stating that the L.L.C. is properly organized to do business in Oklahoma is required.

 

21.   All other Subdivision Regulations shall be met prior to release of final plat.

 

The applicant indicated his agreement with staff’s recommendation.

 

There were no interested parties wishing to speak.


TMAPC Action; 10 members present:

On MOTION of CARNES, the TMAPC voted 10-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Pace, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Collins "absent") to APPROVE the preliminary plat for Burgundy Place, subject to special conditions and standard conditions as recommended by staff.

 

* * * * * * * * * * * *

 

 

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS:

Review of Proposed Capital Improvement Projects for the Brookside Area and Finding them in Accord with the District 6 Detail Plan, A Part of the Comprehensive Plan for the Tulsa Metropolitan Area.

 

Staff Recommendation:

Ms. Matthews stated that she reviewed the list of proposed capital improvement projects for the Brookside Pilot Plan and they generally seem to be in accord with provisions of the District 6 Detail Plan.  She indicated that the following statements, as they are numbered in the Detail Plan, appear to apply to the proposed capital improvements, referenced by their order of priority.

 

Priority #1      Peoria Avenue improvements: 3.4.1.6, referring to development/redevelopment maintaining the pedestrian orientation and including pedestrian amenities; and Design Guidelines from the 1993 Brookside study.

 

Priority #2      Resurfacing and rehabilitating existing residential streets and correcting drainage problems:  5.2.2.2, referring to maintenance of the District’s residential and collector street systems to ensure safe driving conditions; and 6.6.2, referring to upgrading of all utilities to properly serve the District.

 

Priority #3      Beautification of Peoria from 31st to 51st Streets:  3.4.1.9, referring to adherence to the Design Guidelines of the 1993 study; 3.4.1.16, referring to the inclusion of landscaping as part of any development/redevelopment in the area; and 3.4.3.3, referring to development/redevelopment having as a component sidewalk and other pedestrian-oriented improvements, landscaping and lighting.

 

Priority #4      Provision of entry features at Peoria Avenue and Skelly Drive:  3.4.1.16, referring to inclusion of landscaping as part of any development/redevelopment in the area; and 3.4.3.3, referring to development/redevelopment having as components landscaping, signage and other similar improvements.

 


Priority #5      Intersection improvements near Eliot School:  5.2.2.2, referring to maintenance of the District’s residential and collector streets to ensure safe driving conditions; and 5.3.2, referring to development of a system of pedestrian-ways to link schools, parks and other destination points safely.

 

Priority #6      Provision of entry features and improvements at Crow Creek bridge:  See citations on Priority #4, above.

 

Priority #7      Beautification of 41st Street from Rockford Avenue to Riverside Drive:  See citations on Priority #4, above.

 

Priority #8      Provision of parking facilities:  3.4.1.11, referring to provision of adequate off-street parking in relation to development/redevelopment in the area; 3.4.1.14, referring to maximizing use of existing parking facilities, shared use agreements and the possibility of joint developments; and 3.4.1.18, referring to the possibility of creating an assessment district to provide additional parking facilities.

 

The District Plans are general guidelines for development and redevelopment within their boundaries.  The statements cited above appear to address and support the proposed improvements for the Brookside area. 

 

Staff recommends APPROVAL and find these Capital Improvement Projects to be in accord with the Plan.

 

TMAPC Comments:

Mr. Westervelt stated that Mr. Harmon would like to attend the Brookside meetings in order to help the Planning Commission to understand the continuity.  In response, Mr. Carr stated that he would welcome Mr. Harmon to attend the Brookside meetings.

 

TMAPC Action; 10 members present:

On MOTION of CARNES, the TMAPC voted 10-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Pace, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Collins "absent") to APPROVE the proposed Capital Improvement Projects for the Brookside area and find them in accord with the District 6 Detail Plan, a part of the Comprehensive Plan for the Tulsa Metropolitan Area as recommended by staff.

 

* * * * * * * * * * * *

 

 


CONTINUED ZONING PUBLIC HEARING

Application No.:  pud-639                 om/ol/rm-2 to om/ol/rm-2/pud

Applicant:  Roy D. Johnsen                                                                (PD-7) (CD-9)

Location:      Southeast corner of East 21st Street South and South Main

 

TMAPC Comments:

Mr. Westervelt explained that there are numerous speakers and a time limit will be set for each individual.  He submitted for the record letters received in support of the subject application (Exhibit A-8) and letters opposing the subject application (Exhibit A-4).

 

Staff Recommendation:

The PUD proposes a 74-unit townhouse and high-rise multifamily development on 2.58 acres located at the southeast corner of East 21st Street and South Main.  The proposed high-rise multifamily building could be up to 15 stories tall.  The north/south dimension of the subject tract is 295’ and the east/west dimension of the subject tract is 381’.  The tract is bounded on the north by 21st Street, on the south by 22nd Street, on the west by Main Street and on the east by Boston Avenue.

 

The subject tract is zoned OM, OL and RM-2.  There are park and office uses zoned RM-2 and OL to the north of the tract across 21st Street; to the east, across Boston Avenue, are multifamily and duplex uses zoned RM-2; to the south across 22nd Street are multifamily uses zoned RM-2; and to the west across Main Street are office uses, zoned OM and OH.

 

The Comprehensive Plan designates this area Medium Intensity-No Specific Land Use.  The proposed 28.7 dwelling units per acre is well within the intensity allowed by this plan designation.  The existing OM zoning also allows high-rise office buildings by right on that portion of the tract.

 

Staff finds this development implements goals of the Infill Study and the Comprehensive Plan to encourage new residential development in older parts of the city and complements the existing high-rise residential buildings and multifamily already in this area.

 

Therefore, staff finds the uses and intensities of development proposed and as modified by staff to be in harmony with the spirit and intent of the Code.  Based on the following conditions, staff finds PUD-639, as modified by staff, to be:  (1) consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; (2) in harmony with the existing and expected development of surrounding areas; (3) a unified treatment of the development possibilities of the site; and (4) consistent with the stated purposes and standards of the PUD Chapter of the Zoning Code.

 


Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL of PUD-639 subject to the following conditions:

 

  1. The applicant's Outline Development Plan and Text be made a condition of approval, unless modified herein.

 

  1. Development Standards:

 

Land Area (Net):                                                                   2.85 Acres

 

Permitted Uses:                                                        Townhouse Dwellings as allowed in Use Unit 7a; and multifamily dwellings as allowed in Use Unit 8, and uses customarily accessory to the permitted principal uses.

 

            Maximum Number of Dwelling Units:

                        Multifamily                                                                  70 DUs

                        Townhouses                                                                4 DUs

 

            Maximum Building Height:

Multifamily                                                                  15 stories, not to exceed 178’ in height.*

 

                        Townhouses                                                                3 stories

                        Parking Structure                                                        3 levels

 

            Minimum Building Setbacks:

                        Multifamily

                                    From centerline of 21st Street                        80 FT

                                    From centerline of Boston Avenue  180 FT

                                    From centerline of 22nd Street                       90 FT

                                    From centerline of Main Street                       80 FT

 

                        Townhouses

                                    From the centerline of 21st Street                265 FT

                                    From the centerline of Boston Avenue          50 FT

                                    From centerline of 22nd Street                       40 FT

                                    From centerline of Main Street                    270 FT

 

*Amendment to development standards offered by applicant during the public hearing.


                        Parking Structure

                                    From centerline of 21st Street                        45 FT

                                    From centerline of Boston Avenue                 35 FT

                                    From centerline of 22nd Street                     115 FT

                                    From centerline of Main Street                    270 FT

 

            Minimum Livability Space:                                       200 SF per dwelling unit.

 

Off-Street Parking:                                                    Two spaces per dwelling unit,