Tulsa
Metropolitan
Area
Planning Commission
Wednesday, February 28,
2001, 1:30 p.m.
Francis Campbell City
Council Room
Plaza Level, Tulsa Civic
Center
|
Members Present |
Members Absent |
Staff Present |
Others Present |
|
Carnes |
Boyle |
Bruce |
Boulden,
Legal |
|
Harmon |
Midget |
Dunlap |
|
|
Hill |
|
Huntsinger |
|
|
Horner |
|
Stump |
|
|
Jackson |
|
|
|
|
Ledford |
|
|
|
|
Pace |
|
|
|
|
Selph |
|
|
|
|
Westervelt,
Chair |
|
|
|
The notice and agenda of said meeting were posted in the Reception Area of the INCOG offices on Monday, February 26, 2001 at 11:45 a.m., posted in the Office of the City Clerk, as well as in the Office of the County Clerk.
After declaring a quorum present, Chair Westervelt called the meeting to order at 1:40 p.m.
REPORTS:
Committee
Reports:
Mr. Westervelt
reported that the Committee met prior to the TMAPC meeting. He stated that the Committee reviewed
the recommendations changes from the Infill Development Task Force for Zoning
Code amendments. He indicated that
there was additional input or several items and the Committee recommended that
this be heard on March 21, 2001.
* * * * * * * * *
Director’s
Report:
Mr. Stump indicated that there are no items
on the City Council agenda.
* * * * * * * * *
SUBDIVISIONS
LOT-SPLITS FOR WAIVER OF SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS:
L-19187 - Sack & Associates, Inc.
(PD-11) (CD-1)
2000 Block West Newton Street
Staff
Recommendation:
The applicant has applied to split a 60’ X 200’ tract (Tract A) off a 223.72’ X 500’ tract (Tract B). Tract A will be tied to Lot 1, Block 1, Wenwest Estates, to the north. The proposed configuration will result with both tracts having four-side-lot lines; therefore, the applicant is seeking a Waiver of Subdivision Regulations that each tract have no more than three-side-lot lines.
Both tracts meet the RE bulk and area requirements. The Technical Advisory Committee expressed no concerns on this application.
Staff believes this lot-split would not have an adverse effect on the surrounding properties and would therefore recommend APPROVAL of the waiver of Subdivision Regulations and of the lot-split.
The applicant
indicated his agreement with staff’s recommendation.
There were no interested parties wishing to
speak.
TMAPC Action; 9 members
present:
On MOTION of HORNER TMAPC voted 9-0-0 (Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner,
Jackson, Ledford, Pace, Selph, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining";
Boyle, Midget "absent") to APPROVE the waiver of Subdivision Regulations and of
the lot-split for L-19187 as recommended by staff.
* * * * * * * * *
LOT-SPLITS FOR RATIFICATION OF PRIOR APPROVAL:
|
L-19181 – Robert J. Dunkle
(613) |
(PD-13) (County) |
|
12202 North Lewis Avenue |
|
|
L-19182 – Sisemore Weisz & Associates,
Inc. (3294) |
(PD-18) (CD-5) |
|
12320 East 52nd Street |
|
|
L-19190 – City of Tulsa
(1194) |
(PD-17) (CD-6) |
|
17006 East 11th
Street |
|
|
L-19195 – John W. Moody
(684) |
(PD-18) (CD-8) |
|
6140 South 104th East
Avenue |
|
|
L-19197 – Tulsa Development Authority
(2502) |
(PD-2) (CD-1) |
|
1528 North Boston Place |
|
Staff
Recommendation:
Mr. Bruce stated that these lot-splits are all in
order and staff recommends APPROVAL.
There were no interested parties wishing to
speak.
TMAPC Action; 9 members
present:
On MOTION of CARNES, the TMAPC voted 9-0-0 (Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Pace, Selph, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Boyle, Midget "absent") to RATIFY these lot-splits given prior approval, finding them in accordance with Subdivision Regulations as recommended by staff.
* * * * * * * * *
FINAL PLAT:
Tangelwood Estates Amended (2183) (PD 18) (CD 8)
Staff
Recommendation:
The plat re-subdivides Lots 3, 4 and 5 of Block 2 of
the Tanglewood Estates Addition, creating two lots out of three. Tanglewood LLC remains the owner of the
entire addition; the change requires moving a utility easement to the
south.
Staff has notified the utility providers and the
Public Works Department. All
releases have been received and the plat is in order. Staff recommends approval of the final plat.
The applicant
indicated his agreement with staff’s recommendation.
There were no interested parties wishing to
speak.
TMAPC Action; 9 members
present:
On MOTION of HORNER TMAPC voted 9-0-0 (Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner,
Jackson, Ledford, Pace, Selph, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining";
Boyle, Midget "absent") to APPROVE the final plat for Tanglewood Estates
Amended as recommended by staff.
* * * * * * * * *
PRELIMINARY PLAT:
Interstate Batteries - (1183) (PD-18) (CD-8)
7102 South Memorial Drive
Staff
Recommendation:
This plat consists of one lot in one block on 0.476
acres. It will be developed as a retail automotive-related parts
store.
The following were
discussed February 15, 2001 at the
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meeting:
|
Zoning: | |
|
|
The property became subject to plat
when it was rezoned to CS in November 1972. A plat waiver request was
denied by the TMAPC on January 3, 2001. |
|
Streets/access: | |
|
|
During plat waiver review, there was a
requirement to dedicate additional right-of-way along the diagonal
northeast corner. Any changes to this requirement? Access is shown from
Memorial Drive and from 71st Street. The Memorial access is
shown at 38 feet wide, 21 feet from the corner of the property. The 71st St. access is
shown at 32 feet, 7 feet from the property corner. Standard access width is 40 feet
and distance from property corners is 10 feet. There would be no left
turns possible from this site onto either arterial street. Any comments,
concerns, or specific requirements? |
|
|
Somdecerff, Transportation, stated
15-foot utility and sidewalk easement shown on the plat would be
acceptable. |
|
|
French, Traffic, stated that the
access locations and widths are ok as shown. He wanted the standard
language added in the covenants providing for enforceability of the limits
of no access. |
|
3. |
Sewer: |
|
|
There were no sanitary sewer comments
at the plat waiver review. Any comments, concerns, or specific
requirements? |
|
|
There were no comments or
concerns. |
|
4. |
Water: |
|
|
|
|
|
Calkins, Fire Department, confirmed
the above and stated that fire hydrant would be required somewhere along
the street frontage of the property. |
|
5. |
Storm Drainage: |
|
|
There were no stormwater issues raised
at the plat waiver review. Any comments, concerns, or specific
requirements? |
|
6. |
Utilities: |
|
|
Any comments, concerns, or specific
requirements? |
|
|
There were no comments or
concerns. |
|
7. |
Other: |
|
|
There were no other
comments. |
Staff recommends approval of the preliminary
plat subject to the conditions below.
Waivers of Subdivision
Regulations:
1. None
requested.
Special
Conditions:
1. None
needed.
Standard Conditions:
|
1. |
Utility easements shall meet the
approval of the utilities.
Coordinate with Subsurface Committee if underground plant is
planned. Show additional easements as required. Existing easements shall be tied
to or related to property line and/or lot
lines. |
|
2. |
Water and sanitary sewer plans shall
be approved by the Public Works Department prior to release of final
plat. (Include language for
W/S facilities in covenants.) |
|
3. |
Pavement or landscape repair within
restricted water line, sewer line, or utility easements as a result of
water or sewer line or other utility repairs due to breaks and failures,
shall be borne by the owner(s) of the lot(s). |
|
4. |
Any request for creation of a Sewer
Improvement District shall be submitted to the Public Works Department
Engineer prior to release of final plat. |
|
5. |
Paving and/or drainage plans (as
required) shall be approved by the Public Works
Department. |
|
6. |
Any request for a Privately Financed
Public Improvement (PFPI) shall be submitted to the Public Works
Department. |
|
7. |
A topo map shall be submitted for
review by TAC (Subdivision Regulations). (Submit with drainage plans as
directed.) |
|
8. |
Street names shall be approved by the
Public Works Department and shown on plat. |
|
9. |
All curve data, including corner
radii, shall be shown on final plat as
applicable. |
|
10. |
Bearings, or true N/S, etc., shall be
shown on perimeter of land being platted or other bearings as directed by
the County Engineer. |
|
11. |
All adjacent streets, intersections
and/or widths thereof shall be shown on plat. |
|
12. |
It is recommended that the developer
coordinate with the Public Works Department during the early stages of
street construction concerning the ordering, purchase and installation of
street marker signs.
(Advisory, not a condition for plat
release.) |
|
13. |
It is recommended that the applicant
and/or his engineer or developer coordinate with the Tulsa City/County
Health Department for solid waste disposal, particularly during the
construction phase and/or clearing of the project. Burning of solid waste is
prohibited. |
|
14. |
The method of sewage disposal and
plans therefore shall be approved by the City/County Health
Department. [Percolation
tests (if applicable) are required prior to preliminary approval of
plat.] |
|
15. |
The owner(s) shall provide the
following information on sewage disposal system if it is to be privately
operated on each lot: type, size and general location. (This information to be included
in restrictive covenants on plat.) |
|
16. |
The method of water supply and plans
therefore shall be approved by the City/County Health
Department. |
|
17. |
All lots, streets, building lines,
easements, etc., shall be completely
dimensioned. |
|
18. |
The key or location map shall be
complete. |
|
19. |
A Corporation Commission letter,
Certificate of Non-Development, or other records as may be on file, shall
be provided concerning any oil and/or gas wells before plat is
released. (A building line
shall be shown on plat on any wells not officially plugged. If plugged, provide plugging
records.) |
|
20. |
A "Letter of Assurance" regarding
installation of improvements shall be provided prior to release of final
plat. (Including documents
required under 3.6.5 Subdivision Regulations.) |
|
21. |
Applicant is advised of his
responsibility to contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding
Section 404 of the Clean Waters Act. |
|
22. |
All other Subdivision Regulations
shall be met prior to release of final
plat. |
The applicant
indicated his agreement with staff’s recommendation.
There were no interested parties wishing to
speak.
TMAPC Action; 9 members
present:
On MOTION of CARNES TMAPC voted 9-0-0 (Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner,
Jackson, Ledford, Pace, Selph, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining";
Boyle, Midget "absent") to APPROVE the preliminary plat for Interstate
Batteries as recommended by staff.
* * * * * * * * *
The Park at Oak Grove II - (874) (PD 19) (County)
Southeast corner of East 131st Street and South
Garnett Road
This plat consists of 60
lots in 4 blocks on 62.34 acres. It will be developed as a single-family
residential neighborhood. It is surrounded by single-family residential uses and
vacant land zoned RS and AG.
The following were
discussed February 15, 2001 at the
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meeting:
|
1. |
Zoning: |
|
|
The property became subject to plat
when it was rezoned to RE in January 2001. The Broken Arrow Planning
Commission recommended denial of the zoning because it was inconsistent
with their comprehensive plan and because of lack of infrastructure to
serve. The TMAPC recommended
approval and the County Commissioners adopted the
resolution. |
|
|
The property became subject to plat
when it was rezoned to RE in January 2001. |
|
2. |
Streets/access: |
|
|
The project has two points of access,
one to each arterial street. The north access at 131st Street
is shown as 75’ wide, the west access at Garnett Rd. is shown as 70’
wide. Are these acceptable?
Would a stub street to the south property line be desirable to allow
continuation of the street system as these properties develop? Any comments, concerns, or
specific requirements? |
|
|
Rosenbaum, Applicant, explained that
the 131st Street access would have three lanes and a
median. Mr. Rosenbaum stated
that he intended to show these on the plat. |
|
|
Rains, County Engineer, stated that
the island should be placed in a reserve and shown on the plat. He had no concerns with the
70-foot wide entry and streets.
He agreed that a street should be stubbed to the south property
line. He also said the street
names would likely need to be revised. The covenants need to include
language dedicating the streets and reserves. |
|
|
Rosenbaum, Applicant, agreed to revise
the plat to show these items. |
|
3. |
Sewer: |
|
|
Broken Arrow indicated there is no
sewer in the area. The lots
will be developed with septic systems. Any comments, concerns, or
specific requirements? |
|
|
There were no comments or
concerns. |
|
4. |
Water: |
|
|
Broken Arrow indicated there is only a
six-inch waterline to serve this subdivision and no additional service is
anticipated. They stated that
developer would be required to install a 12” main to serve. Any comments, concerns, or
specific requirements? |
|
|
Rosenbaum, Applicant, stated that they
are currently discussing the project with Bixby and Broken Arrow. It has not yet been determined who
will serve the project. |
|
5. |
Storm Drainage: |
|
|
There were no stormwater issues raised
during the zoning case. Any
comments, concerns, or specific requirements? |
|
|
There were no comments or
concerns. |
|
6. |
Utilities: |
|
|
Any comments, concerns, or specific
requirements? |
|
|
There were no comments or
concerns. |
|
7. |
Other: |
|
|
There were no other comments. |
The plat has been revised to include the stub street and
has been reviewed and approved by the County Engineer.
Staff recommends APPROVAL of the preliminary plat subject to the standard conditions below.
|
Waivers of Subdivision Regulations: |
| |
|
1. |
None requested. | |
|
Special Conditions: |
| |
|
1. |
None needed. | |
|
Standard Conditions: |
| |
|
1. |
Utility easements shall meet
the approval of the utilities.
Coordinate with Subsurface Committee if underground plant is
planned. Show additional
easements as required.
Existing easements shall be tied to or related to property line
and/or lot lines. | |
|
2. |
Water and sanitary sewer plans shall be approved by the Public Works Department prior to release of final plat. (Include language for W/S facilities in covenants.) | |
|
3. |
Pavement or landscape repair within restricted water line, sewer line, or utility easements as a result of water or sewer line or other utility repairs due to breaks and failures, shall be borne by the owner(s) of the lot(s). | |
|
4. |
Any request for creation of a Sewer Improvement District shall be submitted to the Public Works Department Engineer prior to release of final plat. | |
|
5. |
Paving and/or drainage plans (as required) shall be approved by the Public Works Department. | |
|
6. |
Any request for a Privately Financed Public Improvement (PFPI) shall be submitted to the Public Works Department. | |
|
7. |
A topo map shall be submitted for review by TAC (Subdivision Regulations). (Submit with drainage plans as directed.) | |
|
8. |
Street names shall be approved by the Public Works Department and shown on plat. | |
|
9. |
All curve data, including corner radii, shall be shown on final plat as applicable. | |
|
10. |
Bearings, or true N/S, etc., shall be shown on perimeter of land being platted or other bearings as directed by the County Engineer. | |
|
11. |
All adjacent streets, intersections and/or widths thereof shall be shown on plat. | |
|
12. |
It is recommended that the developer coordinate with the Public Works Department during the early stages of street construction concerning the ordering, purchase and installation of street marker signs. (Advisory, not a condition for plat release.) | |
|
13. |
It is recommended that the applicant and/or his engineer or developer coordinate with the Tulsa City/County Health Department for solid waste disposal, particularly during the construction phase and/or clearing of the project. Burning of solid waste is prohibited. |
|
14. |
The method of sewage disposal and plans therefore shall be approved by the City/County Health Department. [Percolation tests (if applicable) are required prior to preliminary approval of plat.] |
|
15. |
The owner(s) shall provide the following information on sewage disposal system if it is to be privately operated on each lot: type, size and general location. (This information to be included in restrictive covenants on plat.) |
|
16. |
The method of water supply and plans therefore shall be approved by the City/County Health Department. |
|
17. |
All lots, streets, building lines, easements, etc., shall be completely dimensioned. |
|
18. |
The key or location map shall be complete. |
|
19. |
A Corporation Commission letter, Certificate of Non-Development, or other records as may be on file, shall be provided concerning any oil and/or gas wells before plat is released. (A building line shall be shown on plat on any wells not officially plugged. If plugged, provide plugging records.) |
|
20. |
A "Letter of Assurance" regarding installation of improvements shall be provided prior to release of final plat. (Including documents required under 3.6.5 Subdivision Regulations.) |
|
21. |
Applicant is advised of his responsibility to contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding Section 404 of the Clean Waters Act. |
|
22. |
All other Subdivision Regulations shall be met prior to release of final plat. |
The applicant
indicated his agreement with staff’s recommendation.
There were no interested parties wishing to
speak.
TMAPC Action; 9 members
present:
On MOTION of CARNES TMAPC voted 9-0-0 (Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Pace, Selph, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Boyle, Midget "absent") to APPROVE the preliminary plat for T