Tulsa
Metropolitan
Area
Planning Commission
Wednesday, June 6, 2001,
1:30 p.m.
Francis Campbell City
Council Room
Plaza Level, Tulsa Civic
Center
|
Members Present |
Members Absent |
Staff Present |
Others Present |
|
Boyle |
Jackson |
Beach |
Boulden,
Legal |
|
Carnes |
Ledford |
Bruce |
|
|
Harmon |
Midget |
Dunlap |
|
|
Hill |
Selph |
Huntsinger |
|
|
Horner |
Westervelt |
Matthews |
|
|
Pace |
|
Stump |
|
The notice and agenda of said meeting were posted in the Reception Area of the INCOG offices on Monday, June 4 20, 2001 at 11:15 a.m., posted in the Office of the City Clerk, as well as in the Office of the County Clerk.
After declaring a quorum present, Vice Chair Boyle called the meeting to order at 1:35 p.m.
Minutes:
On MOTION of HARMON the TMAPC
voted 6-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Pace “aye”; no “nays”; none
“abstaining”; Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Selph, Westervelt “absent”) to
APPROVE the minutes of the meeting of May 16, 2001, Meeting No.
2274.
* * * * * * * * *
REPORTS:
Mr. Boyle reported that the Comprehensive Plan Committee met today prior to the TMAPC meeting. There will be a call for a public hearing regarding two amendments to the Comprehensive Plan.
Mr. Boyle reported that the Rules and Regulations Committee met today prior to the TMAPC meeting and reviewed proposed amendments to the Subdivision Regulations.
* * * * * * * * *
Director’s
Report:
Mr. Stump reported that there are several cases to be heard at the City Council on Thursday, June 07, 2001.
* * * * * * * * *
SUBDIVISIONS
LOT-SPLITS FOR RATIFICATION OF PRIOR APPROVAL:
L-19214 – Mike Kerr (1274)
(PD-19) (County)
13924 South
188th East Avenue
L-19224 – James David Hunter
(3092)
(PD-23)
(County)
6621 West Skyline
Drive
L-19225 – Stuart Arnold
(2992)
(PD-9)
(County)
4403 South
61st West Avenue
L-19226 – Anna Sexton (1773)
(PD-21)
(County)
14600 South
Harvard
L-19231 – Benny D. Kellner
(2874)
(PD-20)
(County)
13716 East
161st Street
L-19233 – Jim Level (3294)
(PD-17)
(CD-5)
5802 South 118th East
Avenue
L-19238 – City of Tulsa
(1194)
(PD-17) (CD-6)
16910 East
11th Street
L-19239 – City of Tulsa
(2402)
(PD-25)
(CD-1)
3019 North
Garrison
Staff
Recommendation:
Mr. Beach stated that
all of these lot-splits are in order and staff recommends APPROVAL.
There were no interested parties wishing to
speak.
TMAPC Action; 6 members
present:
On MOTION of HORNER, the TMAPC voted 6-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Pace "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Selph, Westervelt "absent") to RATIFY these lot-splits given prior approval, finding them in accordance with Subdivision Regulations as recommended by staff.
* * * * * * * * *
FINAL
PLAT:
Cooley Creek Center I (494) (PD 17) (CD 6)
Staff
Recommendation:
This plat consists of three lots in one block on 6.9
acres. The three lots will be
accessed via the extension of 130th East Avenue and a mutual access
easement tying to an access point on 129th East Avenue. The proposed lots will be used for
commercial purposes. The interior
collector (130th East Avenue) will be extended across Cooley Creek in
the future to serve additional development.
Releases have been received and
the plat is substantially in order.
Staff recommends approval of the final plat.
There were no interested parties wishing to
speak.
The applicant
indicated his agreement with staff’s recommendation.
TMAPC Action; 6 members
present:
On MOTION of HILL, TMAPC voted 6-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Pace "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Selph, Westervelt "absent") to APPROVE the final plat for Cooley Creek Center, subject to Legal approval of language as recommended by staff.
* * * * * * * * *
PRELIMINARY
PLAT:
Osage Center - (3402, 3502) (PD-11) (CD-1)
Country Club Drive/Osage Drive from Latimer to Haskell Streets
Staff
Recommendation:
Mr. Beach stated that this item needs to be continued due to a flaw in the notice. Staff recommends a continuation to June 27, 2001.
There were no interested parties wishing to
speak.
TMAPC Action; 6
members present:
On MOTION of HORNER, the TMAPC voted 6-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Pace "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Selph, Westervelt "absent") to CONTINUE the preliminary plat for Osage Center to June 27, 2001 at 1:30 p.m. as recommended by staff.
* * * * * * * * *
North Osage Drive between Fairview and
Jasper Streets
Staff
Recommendation:
Mr. Beach stated that this item needs to be continued due to a flaw in the notice. Staff recommends a continuation to June 27, 2001.
There were no interested parties wishing to
speak.
TMAPC Action; 6
members present:
On MOTION of HORNER, the TMAPC voted 6-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Pace "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Selph, Westervelt "absent") to CONTINUE the preliminary plat for Osage Duplexes to June 27, 2001 at 1:30 p.m. as recommended by staff.
* * * * * * * * *
Southern
Woods Park II – (PUD 355-C) (1683) (PD 18-B) (CD
8)
West of the SW/C of E 89th St. S and S. Yale Avenue
Staff
Recommendation:
Staff recommends
continuance of the preliminary plat to June 20, 2001 pending approval of the PUD
by the City Council.
There were no interested parties wishing to
speak.
TMAPC Action; 6
members present:
On MOTION of HARMON, the TMAPC voted 6-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes, Harmon, Hill,
Horner, Pace "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Jackson, Ledford, Midget,
Selph, Westervelt "absent") to CONTINUE the preliminary plat for Southern Woods Park
II to June 20, 2001 at 1:30 p.m.
* * * * * * * * *
Greater Grace Apostolic Temple of Tulsa-
(PUD 644)
(1202) (PD 25) (CD 1)
1019 East 54th Street North Tulsa
Staff
Recommendation:
This plat consists of one lot in one block. The plat doesn’t indicate the land area and the PUD has conflicting information. In one place it says 13+/- acres and in another it says 11.511 acres. It is approved for a maximum of 100,000 SF of church uses under the PUD.
The following were
discussed May 17, 2001 at the
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meeting:
|
1. |
Zoning: |
|
|
Staff: The PUD was
approved earlier this year. It is approved for a maximum of 100,000 SF of
church uses. The covenants do not adequately include the PUD conditions as
required by the Zoning Code. |
|
2. |
Streets/access: |
|
|
Staff:
No new streets or right-of-way.
The PUD allows one access point to each of the abutting streets
except Peoria. |
|
|
Public Works Traffic &
Transportation: Add limits
of no access on face of plat, subject to approval by Traffic Engineering.
Add standard language for limits of no access in the covenants. Add 25’
radius at southwest corner and 30’ radius at southeast corner. Include
Peoria right-of-way on face of plat. |
|
|
Applicant: Consent. |
|
3. |
Sewer: |
|
|
Staff:
No comments. |
|
|
Public Works Waste Water: Add standard sanitary sewer language
in covenants. |
|
|
Applicant: Consent. |
|
4. |
Water: |
|
|
Staff:
No comments. |
|
|
Public Works Water: Add standard water language in
covenants. |
|
|
Applicant: Consent. |
|
5. |
Storm Drainage: |
|
|
Staff:
Drainage easements are shown throughout the property and in some cases are
combined with utility easements. |
|
|
Public Works Stormwater: No storm drainage plans were
submitted. Impossible to determine if easements shown are adequate to
serve. Standard language needs to be included in covenants for detention
and overland drainage to be maintained by the
church. |
|
|
Applicant: Stated that the drainage easements
have been completely redesigned and he will arrange a meeting to review
and discuss. |
|
|
Public Works Stormwater and other TAC
members: Based on the
current information regarding changes to stormwater design and the
incompleteness of the submittal, this plat is not ready to
review. |
|
6. |
Utilities: |
|
|
Staff:
See comment under drainage. |
|
|
No comments from any franchise
utilities. |
|
7. |
Other: |
|
|
Staff
and Public Works, Development Services: Although not a requirement in the
subdivision regulations, the graphics on this plat need to be improved for
clarity of communication.
Include bearings and dimensions, carried to two decimal places, on
all property lines. The Point of Beginning must be shown graphically. The location map must be complete
and should be larger for readability. Numerous misspellings in the
covenants need to be corrected. The PUD number needs to be included. Change obsolete term “Stormwater
Management Department”.
Change “Wagoner County” to “Tulsa County” where applicable. Change form of certificates to
standard signature block. |
|
|
Based
on the forthcoming changes regarding stormwater design and the graphic and
substantive changes needed in the entire plat, TAC voted to table the
item. Staff would
recommend this plat be modified and resubmitted for TAC review at a future
date. |
NOTE: Subsequent to the TAC meeting the applicant
met with representatives of Stormwater, Development Services, and TMAPC staff.
He submitted a revised plat showing stormwater-related easements and
considerable changes in response to TAC comments regarding graphics and basic
required information. The result of the meeting was that staff and Public Works
agree to allow the preliminary plat to move forward to the TMAPC for
approval.
Staff recommends
APPROVAL of the
preliminary plat subject to the
special and standard conditions identified below.
|
Waivers of Subdivision
Regulations: |
| |
|
1. |
None
requested. | |
|
Special Conditions: |
| |
|
1. |
Add limits
of no access to face of plat, subject to approval by Traffic Engineering.
Include standard language in covenants. | |
|
2. |
Dedicate
additional right-of-way at corners as required by the Subdivision
Regulations and City policies. | |
|
3. |
Add
standard sanitary sewer language in the
covenants. | |
|
4. |
Add
standard water language in covenants. | |
|
5. |
Meet all
design and easement requirements of Public Works, Stormwater prior to
release of final plat. Include all standard language in
covenants. | |
|
6. |
Include
all basic information required by the subdivision regulations | |
|
7. |
Modify
covenants to include PUD conditions as required by the Zoning
Code. | |
|
Standard Conditions: |
| |
|
1. |
All
conditions of PUD 644 shall be met prior to release of the final plat,
including any applicable provisions in the covenants or on the face of the
plat. Include PUD approval date and references to applicable sections of
the Zoning Code in the covenants. | |
|
2. |
Utility easements shall meet the
approval of the utilities. Coordinate with Subsurface Committee if
underground plant is planned. Show additional easements as required.
Existing easements shall be tied to or related to property line and/or lot
lines. | |
|
3. |
Water and sanitary sewer plans shall
be approved by the Public Works Department prior to release of final
plat. (Include language for
W/S facilities in covenants.) | |
|
4. |
Pavement or landscape repair within
restricted water line, sewer line, or utility easements as a result of
water or sewer line or other utility repairs due to breaks and failures,
shall be borne by the owner(s) of the lot(s). | |
|
5. |
Any request for creation of a Sewer
Improvement District shall be submitted to the Public Works Department
Engineer prior to release of final plat. | |
|
6. |
Paving and/or drainage plans (as
required) shall be approved by the Public Works
Department. | |
|
7. |
Any request for a Privately Financed
Public Improvement (PFPI) shall be submitted to the Public Works
Department. | |
|
8. |
A topo map shall be submitted for
review by TAC (Subdivision Regulations). (Submit with drainage plans as
directed.) | |
|
9. |
Street names shall be approved by the
Public Works Department and shown on plat. | |
|
10. |
All curve data, including corner
radii, shall be shown on final plat as
applicable. | |
|
11. |
Bearings, or true N/S, etc., shall be
shown on perimeter of land being platted or other bearings as directed by
the County Engineer. | |
|
12. |
All adjacent streets, intersections
and/or widths thereof shall be shown on plat. | |
|
13. |
It is recommended that the developer
coordinate with the Public Works Department during the early stages of
street construction concerning the ordering, purchase and installation of
street marker signs.
(Advisory, not a condition for plat
release.) | |
|
14. |
It is recommended that the applicant
and/or his engineer or developer coordinate with the Tulsa City/County
Health Department for solid waste disposal, particularly during the
construction phase and/or clearing of the project. Burning of solid waste is
prohibited. | |
|
15. |
The method of sewage disposal and
plans therefore shall be approved by the City/County Health
Department. [Percolation
tests (if applicable) are required prior to preliminary approval of
plat.] | |
|
16. |
The owner(s) shall provide the
following information on sewage disposal system if it is to be privately
operated on each lot: type, size and general location. (This information to be included
in restrictive covenants on plat.) | |
|
17. |
The method of water supply and plans
therefore shall be approved by the City/County Health
Department. | |
|
18. |
All lots, streets, building lines,
easements, etc., shall be completely
dimensioned. | |
|
19. |
The key or location map shall be
complete. | |
|
20. |
A Corporation Commission letter,
Certificate of Non-Development, or other records as may be on file, shall
be provided concerning any oil and/or gas wells before plat is
released. (A building line
shall be shown on plat on any wells not officially plugged. If plugged, provide plugging
records.) | |
|
21. |
A "Letter of Assurance" regarding
installation of improvements shall be provided prior to release of final
plat. (Including documents
required under 3.6.5 Subdivision Regulations.) | |
|
22. |
Applicant is advised of his
responsibility to contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding
Section 404 of the Clean Waters Act. | |
|
23. |
All other Subdivision Regulations
shall be met prior to release of final plat. | |
Applicant’s Comments:
Dr. Donald
Tyler, 6205 West Orlando, Broken
Arrow, Oklahoma 74012, stated that he is in agreement with the staff
recommendation.
There were no interested parties wishing to
speak.
TMAPC Action; 6 members
present:
On MOTION of HORNER, TMAPC voted 6-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Pace "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Selph, Westervelt "absent") to APPROVE the preliminary plat for Greater Grace Apostolic Temple of Tulsa subject to special conditions and standard conditions as recommended by staff. (Language in the staff recommendation that was deleted by TMAPC is shown as strikeout; language added or substituted by TMAPC is underlined.)
* * * * * * * * *
PLAT WAIVER:
PUD 557-A (2483) (PD-18) (CD-8)
1/8 Mile east of
Memorial, south side East 93rd Street
Staff
Recommendation:
The PUD Major amendment was approved 11/30/00
and added public libraries to the list of permitted uses in the original PUD.
This triggered the platting requirement.
The following information was provided at
the TAC meeting of May 17, 2001.
STREETS:
Public Works, Transportation: No
comments.
Public Works, Traffic: No comments.
SEWER:
Public Works, Wastewater: No comments.
WATER:
Public Works, Water: No comments
STORM DRAIN:
Public Works, Stormwater: No comments
FIRE:
Public Works, Fire: No comments
UTILITIES:
Franchise
Utilities: No comments.
Based
on discussion with the individuals who will review and approve the changes and
the following checklist, which reflects the policies of TMAPC, staff recommends approval of the request for plat waiver with the
following conditions:
1. Prepare and file of record
restrictive covenants detailing the amended PUD conditions.
A YES answer to the following 3
questions would generally be FAVORABLE to a plat
waiver:
|
|
|
Yes |
NO |
|
1. |
Has
property previously been platted? |
x |
|
|
2. |
Are
there restrictive covenants contained in a previously filed
plat? |
x |
|
|
3. |
Is
property adequately described by surrounding platted properties or street
R/W? |
x |
|
A YES answer to the remaining
questions would generally NOT be favorable to a plat
waiver:
|
4. |
Is right-of-way dedication required to comply with major street and highway plan? |
|
x | |
|
5. |
Will restrictive covenants be filed by separate instrument? |
x |
| |
|
6. |
Infrastructure requirements: |
|
| |
|
|
a) Water |
|
| |
|
|
i. Is a main line water extension required? |
|
x | |
|
|
ii. Is an internal system or fire line required? |
|
x | |
|
|
iii. Are additional easements required? |
|
x | |
|
|
b) Sanitary Sewer |
|
| |
|
|
i. Is a main line extension required? |
|
x | |
|
|
ii. Is an internal system required? |
|
||