Tulsa
Metropolitan
Area
Planning Commission
Wednesday, June 20, 2001,
1:30 p.m.
Francis Campbell City
Council Room
Plaza Level, Tulsa Civic
Center
|
Members Present |
Members Absent |
Staff Present |
Others Present |
|
Boyle |
Pace |
Beach |
Boulden,
Legal |
|
Carnes |
Selph |
Bruce |
|
|
Harmon |
|
Dunlap |
|
|
Hill |
|
Huntsinger |
|
|
Horner |
|
Matthews |
|
|
Jackson |
|
Stump |
|
|
Ledford |
|
|
|
|
Midget |
|
|
|
|
Westervelt |
|
|
|
The notice and agenda of said meeting were posted in the Reception Area of the INCOG offices on Monday, June 18, 2001 at 9:00 a.m., posted in the Office of the City Clerk, as well as in the Office of the County Clerk.
After declaring a quorum present, Chair Westervelt called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m.
Minutes:
On MOTION of HORNER, the TMAPC
voted 7-0-1 (Boyle, Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Jackson, Ledford “aye”; no
“nays”; Westervelt “abstaining”; Midget, Pace, Selph “absent”) to APPROVE
the minutes of the meeting of May 23, 2001, Meeting No.
2275.
Minutes:
Approval of the minutes of June 6, 2001
Meeting No. 2276
On MOTION of HILL, the TMAPC voted 5-0-3 (Boyle, Carnes, Harmon, Hill,
Horner “aye”; no “nays”; Jackson, Ledford, Westervelt “abstaining”; Midget,
Pace, Selph “absent“) to APPROVE the minutes of the meeting of June 6, 2001 Meeting
No. 2276.
REPORTS:
Chairman’s
Reports:
Mr. Westervelt requested Mr. Stump to give an update on the status of the changes to the Zoning Code based on the Infill Development Task Force. In response, Mr. Stump stated that the City Council considered the amendments in the committee on Tuesday, June 19, 2001 and it is on the agenda for first reading, Thursday, June 21, 2001. There were no citizens in opposition at the committee meeting and he assumes that these amendments would move forward.
Mr. Westervelt
requested the status on the sign ordinance. In response, Mr. Stump stated that the
housekeeping amendments to the Sign Code, which was developed by the Sign
Advisory Board and public hearing at the TMAPC, have not moved forward and there
is no planned action on these amendments.
Mr. Stump stated that the more comprehensive amendments that have been
proposed have also been stalled at the City Council. Mr. Stump indicated that he met with the
Sign Advisory Board a month ago and gave a status report regarding these
issues. Mr. Stump stated that the
Sign Advisory Board is trying to get these items
reactivated.
Mr. Westervelt asked Mr. Stump for a status on the funding for the website enhancements. In response, Mr. Stump stated that the budget has not been approved at this time. However, in the Mayor’s proposal $23,000 is proposed for additional consultant work to help staff supply more information on each zoning and Board of Adjustment case onto the website. Mr. Stump indicated that once this is done, then it could eliminate mailing to neighborhood associations that are able to access the information from INCOG’s website.
Mr. Midget in at 1:35
p.m.
Items to be
continued:
Osage Center – (3402, 3502) (PD-11) (CD-1)
Country Club Drive/Osage Drive from Latimer to Haskell Streets
Osage Duplexes – (3402, 3502) (PD-11) (CD-1)
North Osage Drive between Fairview and Jasper Streets
Applicant has timely requested a continuance to June 27, 2001.
TMAPC Action; 9
members present:
On MOTION of MIDGET, the TMAPC voted 8-0-1 (Boyle, Carnes, Harmon, Hill,
Horner, Jackson, Midget, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; Ledford ”abstaining";
Pace, Selph "absent") to CONTINUE the preliminary plats for Osage Center and
Osage Duplexes to June 27, 2001 at 1:30 p.m.
Application
No.: CZ-284/PUD-653
AG
to RS
Applicant: Joe E. Donelson
(PD-20) (County)
Location:
Northwest corner of East 141st Street South and South Sheridan
Road
Applicant has requested a continuance to June
27, 2001.
TMAPC Action; 9
members present:
On MOTION of BOYLE, the TMAPC voted 9-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes, Harmon, Hill,
Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none
”abstaining"; Pace, Selph "absent") to CONTINUE CZ-284/PUD-653 to June 27, 2001 at 1:30
p.m.
* * * * * * * * *
Mr. Ledford,
Chair, stated that the committee has an item on the agenda today, Item No.
32.
* * * * * * * * *
Director’s
Report:
Mr. Stump stated that there are several items on the City Council agenda for Thursday, June 21, 2001.
* * * * * * * * *
SUBDIVISIONS
LOT-SPLITS FOR WAIVER OF SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS:
L-19228 - Gerda Maria Kennedy
(PD-26)
(County)
Location:
525 East New Orleans
Staff
Recommendation:
Mrs. Kennedy purchased a ten-acre tract (Tract 1) and later purchased a three-acre parcel (Tract 2). In 1997, Mrs. Kennedy sold the south 6.57 acres of Tract 1 with Tract 2 without obtaining a lot-split. She now is selling the north 3.43 acres of Tract 1, which was recently annexed into Broken Arrow’s City Limits, and is required to obtain lot-split approval in order to give clear title.
Therefore, the applicant has applied to split the original ten-acre tract into two parcels, with the southern 6.57 acres being tied to Tract 2 for street frontage, thus creating a tract with five side-lot lines. The applicant is seeking a waiver of Subdivision Regulations that each tract have no more than three side-lot lines.
The City of Broken Arrow has requested 60’ right-of-way along New Orleans, and the Major Street and Highway Plan calls for 50’ right-of-way along Lynn Lane. The owner of Tract 2 has requested a waiver of the required right-of-way. Staff considers Tract 2 to qualify for reduced dedication of right-of-way, considering Section 6.5.3.(c)(3) of the Subdivision Regulations. Where land to be split contains, within its boundaries, areas designated for street right-of-way on the Tulsa City-County Major Street and Highway Plan, the split shall not be approved where street rights-of-way fail to conform to said plan except, upon a finding that: development made possible by the split itself will not measurably increase the burden of traffic on an adjacent street to such an extent that it would adversely affect the health, safety, and welfare of the public.
Staff recognizes that Tract 2 has already been deeded to another party and believes this lot-split would not have an adverse effect on the surrounding properties. Staff would therefore recommend APPROVAL of the waiver of Subdivision Regulations of the three side-lot lines, the waiver of the required right-of-way on Lynn Lane, and the lot-split, with the condition that the 60’ right-of-way on New Orleans be dedicated to the City of Broken Arrow.
Applicant’s Comments:
William M. Martin, 3918 South Evanston, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74105, submitted the Power of Attorney (Exhibit A-1) and requested an approval of L-19228.
There were no interested parties wishing to
speak.
TMAPC Action; 9 members
present:
On MOTION of CARNES, TMAPC voted 9-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Pace, Selph "absent") to APPROVE the waiver of Subdivision Regulations and the lot-split for L-19228, subject to conditions as recommended by staff.
* * * * * * * * *
FINAL
PLAT:
Windham Hill - (2894) (PD-17) (CD-6)
Location:
Northwest corner of 51st and 145th East Avenue
Staff
Recommendation:
The property is zoned CS – Commercial Shopping. Staff found no zoning files on this
property so it is assumed that the subject property has been zoned CS since the
adoption of the current zoning ordinance in July 1970. Staff has no information as to the
requirement to plat so it is assumed that this plat is submitted
voluntarily.
This plat consists of one lot in one block on .9276
acres. It will be developed for
commercial uses under CS zoning. It
is surrounded by vacant land or sparsely developed land on all sides. Broken Arrow is east, southeast and
south.
All releases are in and the plat is in order. Staff recommends approval of the final plat.
There were no interested parties wishing to
speak.
The applicant
indicated his agreement with staff’s recommendation.
TMAPC Action; 9 members
present:
On MOTION of CARNES, TMAPC voted 9-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Midget, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Pace, Selph "absent") to APPROVE the final plat for Windham Hill as recommended by staff.
* * * * * * * * *
Mr. Midget out at 1:45
p.m.
Spicewood - PUD 359-A
(1283)
(PD-18) (CD-8)
Location: East 77th Street South, east side
of South Memorial Drive
Staff
Recommendation:
This plat consists of 37 lots in one block and two
reserves on 8.73 acres. It will be
developed for single-family attached dwellings similar to townhouses. This is a replat of Lot 2, Mayfair
Courts.
All releases are in and the plat is in order;
therefore, staff recommends approval of the final plat, subject to the plat and the
covenants being modified to clarify the location of the mutual access easement
that is required in order to provide access to the nursing home abutting to the
east.
There were no interested parties wishing to
speak.
The applicant
indicated his agreement with staff’s recommendation.
TMAPC Action; 8 members
present:
On MOTION
of HORNER, TMAPC voted 8-0-0 (Boyle,
Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays";
none ”abstaining"; Midget, Pace, Selph "absent") to APPROVE the final plat for Spicewood, subject to conditions
recommended by staff.
* * * * * * * * *
Faith Assembly Church -
(3224)
(PD-14)
(County)
Location: 13502 North 119th East
Avenue
Staff
Recommendation:
This plat consists of one lot in one block on 5.0
acres. It is the site of an
existing church with immediate plans for expansion. The Board of Adjustment recently
approved a special exception to permit expansion of the existing church and
accessory uses. This approval
triggered the platting requirement.
All releases are in and the plat is in order;
therefore, staff recommends approval of the final plat.
There were no interested parties wishing to
speak.
The applicant
indicated his agreement with staff’s recommendation.
TMAPC Action; 8 members
present:
On MOTION of HORNER, TMAPC voted 8-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes, Harmon, Hill,
Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining";
Midget, Pace, Selph "absent") to APPROVE the final plat for Faith Assembly Church as
recommended by staff.
* * * * * * * * *
PRELIMINARY
PLAT:
Staff
Recommendation:
The following information was presented to TAC at the meeting of 06/07/01.
The site is located just east of the halfway point between Harvard and Yale on the south side of 91st Street. It is abutted on the east by the All Saints Anglican Plat with a single-family home on the site, on the south by vacant land zoned AG and west by unplatted property zoned AG with a cemetery on it. The site includes significant tree coverage and slopes from east to west.
The PUD was approved by the City Council on June 1, 2000, and allows the uses of the OL district.
STREETS
The site will be accessed off of 91st Street
and will not create any new streets.
SEWER
Atlas sheet 1137 indicates ten feet present to the west.
WATER
Sheet 1147 indicates
12” present along the north side of 91st
Street.
The plat indicates City of Tulsa regulatory floodplain in the southwest corner.
Detention facilities are not addressed by the plat.
A 17.5’ utility
easement is indicated at the perimeter.
Staff presented the
following comments from the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
meeting:
|
1. |
Zoning: None. |
|
2. |
Streets/access: |
|
|
Limits of No Access language should be
included in the covenants. |
|
|
Moving the 91st Street
access to the west as requested is acceptable. |
|
3. |
Sewer: |
|
|
An extension will be required in a 15’
easement. |
|
4. |
Water: |
|
|
No
comment. |
|
5. |
Storm Drainage: |
|
|
Easement will be required for the
floodplain with 15’ to each side. |
|
6. |
Utilities: |
|
|
Covenants should address installation
in landscape areas. |
|
7. |
Other: |
Staff recommends
approval of the
preliminary plat subject to the special and standard conditions below.
|
Waivers of Subdivision
Regulations: |
| |
|
1. |
None
requested. | |
|
Special Conditions: |
| |
|
1. |
Sewer line extension per Public
Works. | |
|
2. |
Easement over the Regulatory Flood
Plain per Public Works. | |
|
3. |
Limits of No Access language in
covenants. | |
|
4.
|
Language in covenants dealing with
utility installation in landscaped areas. | |
|
Standard Conditions: |
| |
|
1. |
Utility easements shall meet the
approval of the utilities.
Coordinate with Subsurface Committee if underground plant is
planned. Show additional
easements as required.
Existing easements shall be tied to or related to property line
and/or lot lines. | |
|
2. |
Water and sanitary sewer plans shall
be approved by the Public Works Department prior to release of final
plat. (Include language for
W/S facilities in covenants.) | |
|
3. |
Pavement or landscape repair within
restricted water line, sewer line, or utility easements as a result of
water or sewer line or other utility repairs due to breaks and failures
shall be borne by the owner(s) of the lot(s). | |
|
4. |
Any request for creation of a Sewer
Improvement District shall be submitted to the Public Works Department
Engineer prior to release of final plat. | |
|
5. |
Paving and/or drainage plans (as
required) shall be approved by the Public Works
Department. | |
|
6. |
Any request for a Privately Financed
Public Improvement (PFPI) shall be submitted to the Public Works
Department. | |
|
7. |
A topo map shall be submitted for
review by TAC (Subdivision Regulations). (Submit with drainage plans as
directed.) | |
|
8. |
Street names shall be approved by the
Public Works Department and shown on plat. | |
|
9. |
All curve data, including corner
radii, shall be shown on final plat as
applicable. | |
|
10. |
Bearings, or true N/S, etc., shall be
shown on perimeter of land being platted or other bearings as directed by
the County Engineer. |
|
11. |
All adjacent streets, intersections
and/or widths thereof shall be shown on plat. |
|
12. |
It is recommended that the developer
coordinate with the Public Works Department during the early stages of
street construction concerning the ordering, purchase and installation of
street marker signs.
(Advisory, not a condition for plat
release.) |
|
13. |
It is recommended that the applicant
and/or his engineer or developer coordinate with the Tulsa City/County
Health Department for solid waste disposal, particularly during the
construction phase and/or clearing of the project. Burning of solid waste is
prohibited. |
|
14. |
The method of sewage disposal and
plans therefore shall be approved by the City/County Health
Department. [Percolation
tests (if applicable) are required prior to preliminary approval of
plat.] |
|
15. |
The owner(s) shall provide the
following information on sewage disposal system if it is to be privately
operated on each lot: type, size and general location. (This information to be included
in restrictive covenants on plat.) |
|
16. |
The method of water supply and plans
therefore shall be approved by the City/County Health
Department. |
|
17. |
All lots, streets, building lines,
easements, etc., shall be completely
dimensioned. |
|
18. |
The key or location map shall be
complete. |
|
19. |
A Corporation Commission letter,
Certificate of Non-Development, or other records as may be on file, shall
be provided concerning any oil and/or gas wells before plat is
released. (A building line
shall be shown on plat on any wells not officially plugged. If plugged, provide plugging
records.) |
|
20. |
A "Letter of Assurance" regarding
installation of improvements shall be provided prior to release of final
plat (including documents required under 3.6.5 Subdivision
Regulations). |
|
21. |
Applicant is advised of his
responsibility to contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding
Section 404 of the Clean Waters Act. |
|
22. |
All other Subdivision Regulations
shall be met prior to release of final
plat. |
There were no interested parties wishing to
speak.
The applicant
indicated his agreement with staff’s recommendation.
TMAPC Action; 8 members
present:
On MOTION of HORNER, TMAPC voted 8-0-0 (Boyle, Carnes, Harmon, Hill,
Horner, Jackson, Ledford, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining";
Midget, Pace, Selph "absent") to APPROVE the preliminary plat for Southern Ridge
subject to special conditions and standard conditions as recommended by
staff.
* * * * * * * * *
Staff
Recommendation:
The area to be
platted is Development Area A of PUD 587, located at the southwest corner of the
PUD. It is abutted by Yale Avenue
on the east, Development Area B on the south, a detention facility on the west
and 81st Street on the north.
Development Area A
allows a variety of uses including offices and studios, entertainment and eating
establishments and convenience and shopping goods and
services.
STREETS
The plat indicates two access points off of 81st Street and two off of Yale. A mutual access easement runs parallel to the Yale and 81st Street frontage with another running along the eastern and southern boundaries.
No new streets are indicated by the plat.
SEWER
Atlas sheet 883
indicates sanitary sewer in the western portion of the
site.
WATER
Sheet 883 indicates
water along 81st Street.
The plat does not address drainage or detention.
The plat indicates a 17.5’
utility easement along the eastern boundary. It also indicates joint use easements
along the north, west and south boundaries.
Staff presents the
following comments from the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
meeting:
|
1. |
Zoning: No
comment. |
|
2. |
Streets/access: |
|
a. |
The northern access on Yale will be
right-turn only. |
|
b. |
The southern access on Yale should be
lined up with the driveway to the east. |
|
c. |
The access off of 81st
Street should be 40’ not 45’. |
|
d. |
Curve data should be shown for mutual
access easement in the southwest portion of
site. |
|
3. |
Sewer: |
|
|
No
comment. |
|
4. |
Water: |
|
|
No
comment. |
|
5. |
Storm Drainage: |
|
|
No
comment. |
|
6. |
Utilities: |
|
a. |
Language related to installation in
landscaped areas should be included in
covenants. |
|
b. |
A 17.5’ easement should be shown
outside the mutual access easement throughout the
site. |
|
7. |
Other: |
Staff recommends
approval of the
preliminary plat subject to the special and standard conditions below.
|
Waivers of Subdivision
Regulations: |
| |
|
1. |
None
requested. | |
|
Special Conditions: |
| |
|
1. |
The northern access onto Yale will be
right-turn only. | |
|
2. |
The southern access onto Yale should
be lined up with the access to the east. | |
|
3.
|
The mutual access easement and its
access onto Yale should be 40’ wide. | |
|
4. |
Language related to installation of
utilities in landscaped areas should be included in the
covenants. | |
|
5. |
A 17.5’ utility easement should be
shown outside the mutual access easement throughout the
plat. | |
|
Standard Conditions: |
| |