Tulsa Metropolitan Area Planning Commission
Wednesday,
December 5, 2001, 1:30 p.m.
Francis Campbell
City Council Room
Plaza Level,
Tulsa Civic Center
|
Members Present |
Members Absent |
Staff Present |
Others Present |
|
Carnes |
Bayles |
Bruce |
Romig, Legal |
|
Harmon |
Selph |
Dunlap |
|
|
Hill |
Horner |
Huntsinger |
|
|
Jackson |
|
|
|
|
Ledford |
|
|
|
|
Midget |
|
|
|
|
Pace |
|
|
|
|
Westervelt |
|
|
|
The notice and agenda of
said meeting were posted in the Reception Area of the INCOG offices on Monday,
December 5, 2001 at 8:32 a.m., posted in the Office of the City Clerk, as well
as in the Office of the County Clerk.
After declaring a quorum
present, Chair Westervelt called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m.
Minutes:
On MOTION of CARNES, the TMAPC voted 5-0-1 (Carnes,
Harmon, Ledford, Pace, Westervelt “aye”; no “nays”; Hill “abstaining”; Bayles,
Horner, Jackson, Midget, Selph “absent”) to APPROVE the minutes of the
meeting of November 28, 2001, Meeting No. 2293.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
REPORTS:
Chairman’s Report:
Mr. Westervelt announced the following
changes for today’s agenda:
|
APPLICATION
NO.: PUD-599-A-1 |
Minor
Amendment |
|
|
Applicant: John
W. Moody |
(pd-18) (cd-8) |
|
|
Location: |
West of the southwest corner of East 61st
Street and South 104th East Avenue |
|
There
were no interested parties wishing to speak.
The applicant has withdrawn this application.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
|
APPLICATION
NO.: PUD-431-B-1 |
MINOR AMENDMENT |
|
|
Applicant: Roy D. Johnsen |
(pd-26) (cd-8) |
|
|
Location: |
West of
southwest corner of East 101st Street and South Sheridan Road |
|
Staff Recommendation:
Staff requests a continuance to December 19th
in order to give proper notification.
There
were no interested parties wishing to speak.
TMAPC Action; 6 members
present:
On MOTION of HARMON, the TMAPC voted 6-0-0 (Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Ledford,
Pace, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining";
Bayles, Horner, Jackson, Midget, Selph "absent") to CONTINUE the minor amendment for PUD-431-B-1 to December 19, 2001 at 1:30 p.m.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
Worksession Reports:
Mr. Westervelt stated that staff would like
to inform the Planning Commission about the annexation of Fair Oaks. He requested staff to schedule a worksession
for December 19, 2001 and attempt to have all of the Planning Commissioners in
attendance.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
Director’s
Report:
Mr. Dunlap reported that there is one item on
the City Council agenda for Thursday, December 06, 2001. He indicated that Dane Matthews would be attending
the meeting.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
SUBDIVISIONS:
FINAL
PLAT:
Trinity Park East (3304) (PD-16) (CD-6)
Staff Recommendation:
The project is east of the Trinity Park Plat, which is the site of Church On The Move (Willie George Ministries). The proposed uses of this site will include church-related uses, primarily recreation-related and the storage of buses.
Release letters are in order. Staff recommends approval subject to compliance with requests from the City Attorney’s Office.
There
were no interested parties wishing to speak.
The applicant indicated his agreement with
staff’s recommendation.
TMAPC Action; 6 members
present:
On MOTION of HILL, TMAPC voted 6-0-0 (Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Ledford, Pace, Westervelt
"aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Bayles, Horner,
Jackson, Midget, Selph "absent") to APPROVE the final plat for
Trinity Park East as recommended by staff.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
PRELIMINARY PLAT:
Staff Recommendation:
The site is located on the north side of 51st Street west of
193rd East Avenue (County Line Road). The area on the north side of
51st Street is primarily vacant and agricultural in use. An existing
airstrip, which is no longer in use, is in the eastern portion of the
site. East 51st Street is
the dividing line between Tulsa and Broken Arrow, with Broken Arrow to the
south. Multi family use is to the south.
The proposed use is single-family residential on lots of approximately
55’ x 120’.
The Commission approved the preliminary plat on December 20, 2000. Progress has been slowed due to the cost of
water line extension.
The applicant is now ready to proceed with the project and requests
extension of the Preliminary Plat. Changes to the plat as previously submitted
will be minimal.
Staff recommends approval of a six-month extension to June 20,
2002.
There
were no interested parties wishing to speak.
The applicant indicated his agreement with
staff’s recommendation.
TMAPC Action; 6 members
present:
On MOTION of HARMON, TMAPC voted 6-0-0 (Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Ledford, Pace, Westervelt
"aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining"; Bayles, Horner, Jackson,
Midget, Selph "absent") to APPROVE the preliminary plat extension to June 20,
2002 (six months) as recommended by staff.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
Mr. Midget in at 1:36 p.m.
|
APPLICATION
NO.: PUD-600-B |
MAJOR
AMENDMENT |
|
|
Applicant: Kevin
Coutant |
(pd-18) (cd-8) |
|
|
Location: |
South of southwest corner of East 91st
Street and South Toledo |
|
Staff Recommendation:
Development Area A of PUD-600-A consists of approximately 13.34 acres located west of the southwest corner of East 91st Street and South Yale Avenue. The approved permitted uses for the Development Area are those permitted by right in an OL district and barber and beauty shops as included within Use Unit 13.
This major amendment proposes to amend the development standards of PUD-600-A to allow the construction of a 80-foot wooden monopole cellular transmission tower. The tower would be located on Lot 4, Block 4, Ashton Creek Office Park. There is an existing cemetery abutting the subject tract on the west. Other boundaries of the tract are abutted by properties that are also included within PUD-600-A.
Staff finds the uses and intensities of development proposed and as modified by staff to be in harmony with the spirit and intent of the Code. Based on the following conditions, staff finds PUD-600-B as modified by staff, to be: (1) consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; (2) in harmony with the existing and expected development of surrounding areas; (3) a unified treatment of the development possibilities of the site; and (4) consistent with the stated purposes and standards of the PUD Chapter of the Zoning Code.
Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL
of PUD-600-B subject to the following conditions:
|
1. |
The applicant's Outline Development Plan and Text be made a condition
of approval, unless modified herein. |
|||||
|
2. |
Development Standards: |
|||||
|
Land Area (Net): |
|
900 SF |
|||
|
Permitted Uses: |
|
||||
|
|
Cellular communication tower as included within Use Unit 4, which is
of a wooden monopole design. |
||||
|
Maximum Tower Height: |
80 FT |
||||
|
Maximum Number of Towers: |
One |
||||
|
Minimum Setbacks: |
|
||||
|
|
The center of the tower shall be 5.0 feet from the north
boundary of Lot 4, Block 4, Ashton Creek Office Park and 28.5 feet from the
west boundary of the lot.* |
||||
|
Other Conditions: |
|
||||
|
|
As established within Use Unit 4. |
||||
|
3. |
No zoning clearance permit shall be issued for a lot within the PUD
until a detail site plan for the lot, which includes all buildings, parking
and landscaping areas, has been submitted to the TMAPC and approved as being
in compliance with the approved PUD development standards. |
|||||
|
4. |
All trash, mechanical and equipment areas, including building-mounted,
shall be screened from public view in such a manner that the areas cannot be
seen by persons standing at ground level. |
|||||
|
5. |
The Department Public Works or a professional engineer registered in
the State of Oklahoma shall certify to the appropriate City official that all
required stormwater drainage structures and detention areas serving a lot
have been installed in accordance with the approved plans prior to issuance
of an occupancy permit on that lot. |
|||||
|
6. |
No building permit shall be issued until the requirements of Section
1107F of the Zoning Code have been satisfied and approved by the TMAPC and
filed of record in the County Clerk's office, incorporating within the
restrictive covenants the PUD conditions of approval and making the City
beneficiary to said covenants that relate to PUD conditions. |
|||||
|
7. |
Subject to conditions recommended by the Technical Advisory Committee
during the subdivision platting process, which are approved by TMAPC. |
|||||
|
8. |
Approval of the PUD is not an endorsement of the conceptual
layout. This will be done during
detail site plan review or the subdivision platting process. |
|||||
|
9. |
There shall be no storage of recyclable material, trash or similar
material, nor shall trucks or truck trailers be parked in the PUD except
while they are actively being loaded or unloaded. Truck trailers shall not be used for storage. |
|||||
*As depicted on the
attached site plan.
The applicant has submitted an amended site
plan and staff has reviewed the amendments are recommends approval.
There were no interested parties wishing to speak.
Applicant’s Comments:
Kevin Coutant, 320 South Boston, Suite 500, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103, stated that the
only amendment to the application is that the tower would be 80 feet rather
than the 90 feet as originally requested.
TMAPC Action; 7 members
present:
On MOTION of HILL, the TMAPC voted 7-0-0 (Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Ledford,
Midget, Pace, Westervelt "aye"; no "nays"; none ”abstaining";
Bayles, Horner, Jackson, Selph "absent") to recommend APPROVAL of the major amendment for PUD-600-B as amended and subject to
conditions recommended by staff.
Legal Description for PUD-600-B:
The North
300¢ of
the East 30¢ of
the West 55.¢ Lot 4,
Block 4, Ashton Creek Office Park, an addition to the City of Tulsa, Tulsa
County, State of Oklahoma, and located south of the southwest corner of East 91st
Street South and South Toledo Avenue, Tulsa, Oklahoma, From OL/PUD-600-A (Office Low Intensity District/Planned Unit
Development) To OL/PUD-600-B (Office Low Intensity District/Planned Unit
Development).
* * * * * * * * * * * *
|
APPLICATION
NO.: PUD-514-1 |
MINOR
AMENDMENT |
|
|
Applicant: Roy
D. Johnsen |
(pd-6) (cd-7) |
|
|
Location: |
Northeast
corner of East 33rd Street and South Yale Avenue |
|
Staff Recommendation:
The applicant is requesting a minor amendment to allow a canopy height of a maximum of 25 feet for a new bank facility. The Planned Unit Development allows a maximum building height of 15 feet.
The underlying zoning for the PUD within the western 200 feet (approximately) of the property is CS, and the eastern part of the property has RS-2 underlying zoning. There are duplex and single-family residential uses to the north, east, and south of the eastern part of the subject site.
Staff can recommend APPROVAL of the minor amendment requested with the conditions that there be no signage or lighting facing the residential uses to the north, east and south and that the canopy remain within the western 225 feet of the Planned Unit Development.
TMAPC Comments:
Mr. Harmon asked
Mr. Dunlap why the recommendation changed.
In response, Mr. Dunlap stated that there was a staff member who thought
the case maps were to scale and the proposal didn’t scale correctly; however,
now it has been corrected. Mr. Harmon
asked if the computer-generated maps would cause problems in the future; if
they were not to scale, it would be miscalculated. In response, Mr. Dunlap stated that staff and Mr. Johnsen agree
that the case maps should be to scale.
Mr. Dunlap commented that staff would address this issue.
Applicant’s Comments:
Roy Johnsen, 201 West 5th, Suite 501, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103, stated that the case maps are to scale and they are not out of proportion; however, it is not a recognized scale. He explained that the staff member used the regular scale assuming it was to architectural scale. He commented that the map is correct proportionally and it is still helpful.
TMAPC Action; 8 members
present:
On MOTION of CARNES, TMAPC voted 7-0-1 (Carnes, Harmon, Hill, Ledford, Midget, Pace, Westervelt
"aye"; no "nays"; Jackson” abstaining"; Bayles,
Horner, Selph "absent") to APPROVE
the minor amendment for PUD-514-1 subject to conditions as recommended by
staff.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
|
APPLICATION
NO.: PUD-390-A |
MAJOR
AMENDMENT |
|
|
Applicant: John
W. Moody |
(pd-18) (cd-7) |
|
|
Location: |
Northeast
corner of East 61st Street and South 89th East Avenue |
|
Staff Recommendation:
PUD-390 consists of 2.2913 acres located at the northeast corner of East 61st Street and South 89th East Avenue. The PUD was approved for uses permitted in an OL district, excluding funeral home use and drive-bank facilities. This major amendment proposes to divide the site into two development areas. Development Area A would contain a branch bank with drive-in facilities. Development Area B is proposed for office uses.
The subject tract is zoned PUD-390/OL. The tract is abutted on the north by single-family dwellings zoned RS-3 and on the east by a townhouse development zoned RT. To the west of the tract, across South 89th East Avenue, are single-family dwellings and duplexes zoned RS-3. To the south, across East 61st Street South, is vacant property zoned RM-1/PUD-397 that has been approved for uses permitted by right in an OL district, excluding funeral homes and drive-in banks.
The conditions are very similar to those in 1985 when the City Commission found that drive-in bank facilities were not appropriate for the site.
Staff finds the uses proposed to not be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan or harmony with the existing and expected development of surrounding areas.
Therefore, staff recommends DENIAL of PUD-390-A.
If the Planning Commission finds that drive-in banking facilities are appropriate on the subject tract, staff would recommend the following conditions:
|
1. |
The applicant's Outline Development Plan and Text be made a condition
of approval, unless modified herein. |
|
2. |
Development Standards: |
DEVELOPMENT AREA A
|
Land Area (Net): |
49,807 SF |
|
|||||
|
Permitted Uses: |
|
|
|||||
|
|
Those uses included within Use Unit 11, including drive-in bank
facilities and excluding funeral home uses. |
|
|||||
|
Maximum Building Floor Area: |
5,000 SF |
|
|||||
|
Maximum Building Height: |
One-story |
|
|||||
|
Minimum Building Setbacks:* |
|
|
|||||
|
From the centerline of East 61st Street |
100 FT |
|
||||
|
From the centerline of South 89th East Avenue |
55 FT |
|
||||
|
From the east boundary of the Development Area |
5 FT |
|
||||
|
From the north boundary of the Development Area |
20 FT |
|
||||
|
Minimum Off-Street Parking: |
|
|||||
|
|
As required by the applicable Use Unit of the Tulsa Zoning Code. |
|||||
|
Minimum Landscaped Area: |
15% of net lot area. |
|||||
|
Signs: |
|
|||||
|
|
As permitted in an OL district, but there shall be no |
|||||
|
Other Bulk and Area Requirements: |
|
|||||
|
|
As established within an OL district. |
|||||
*The drive-in facility, and/or canopy, shall be located on the south
side of the building, shall be set back a minimum of 110 feet from the north
boundary of the PUD and shall meet the other minimum building setback
requirements listed above.
|
Land Area (Net): |
50,000 SF |
||||||
|
||||||||